Just a Ex Jailbird.

Well, it was only a matter of time that the housewife of Wolverhampton created havoc on the world of child protection. The jealous housewife who does nothing with her time apart from spew bile continues on her tatty little blog in the middle of nowhere. This week saw David Southall fail his appeal but we know that is just about the failings of the GMC. It is not about the failings of anyone else. It does not distract us from knowing that she was the coordinator of the David Southall complaints. Spending all day and night on her phone plotting the downfall of doctors simply by inventing flamboyant allegations. If Paul Philip wants to believe the words of a upside down pineapple cake then that is up to him.

Take a bow Penny Mellor, the woman who single handedly took down David Southall but still remains just a House Wife with no education to her name. Nothing wrong with being a House Wife albeit a dangerous one. We note all her appeals on her prior criminal sanction failed. This means we can call her a ex jail bird. Her blog tells us that Panorama has been door stepping her. She hasn't been happy about it.

We also know she cannot tolerate the success of others. It is a fact that others have moved on and have a life while Penny Mellor, the ex jail bird remains lost in her life of David Southall obsessions. Now that David Southall is no longer on the Register, what now for her? David Southall continues with his humanitarian work and is probably quite happy being retired. Anyone would breath a sigh of relief to be away from the GMC register and away from Mellors coordinated complaints. It seems obvious to us that this is why child protection is failing.

Penny Mellor remains just a house wife with too much time on her hands. On the last time around, the disconnection effect took place with this Mellor. We all become bored of her tiresome warblings. Just like a fishwife she goes on a soporific tirade. Perhaps it is simply because she is so uneducated that her sentence structure, her grammar and her manner is so awful.

Perhaps her Scientology friends will be only too happy to fund her basic education. Spelling and numbers may be a start. Then academic achievement is not Mellor's forte. While others qualify and progress onwards in journalism, she is just an ex jail bird with no qualifications to her name. Scientology normally has to have educated people who are high achievers. Heaven only knows what ditch they picked this one from.

CCHR [Brian Daniels] HELPING PENNY MELLOR GET "MSBP PSYCHS STRUCK OFF" - QUESTIONS MELLOR REFUSES TO ANSWER. SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATES

For Penny Mellor, she has always crowed about the " TRUTH" and "Transparency".

So, lets have the disclosure and frank account of Mellor's contact with CCHR/ Scientology.

Questions for Mellor

1. How long have you been in contact with CCHR Scientology?
2.What is your contact with Breggin and Dr. Sami Timimi. Dr Sami Timimi was the event speaker at CCHR's award ceremony but Mellor will be aware of that?
3. How many psychs and paediatricians [ msbp] have you or CCHR referred to the GMC?
4. How many msbp psychs have been struck off?
5. How many mothers have you recruited to Scientology/CCHR.

Update 29th June 2008

It has been an interesting two days. Mellor has been unable to respond to the questions above.
Motormouth herself seems really lost for words. Mellor's bad language has been addressed by Totally Disgusted who was not impressed.

For two days, Mellor has been unable to be as transparent as she feels doctors should be. So, for the entertainment of the masses who regularly check back, we thought we would update you on a extract that we found this morning. This is Mellor singing Dr Timimi's praises. It might have helped if she could spell "psychiatrist".

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 3:18 pm
Post subject: Diagnosis of Autism

"I have met Sami Timimi who is a wonderful caring child psychiatirist, far more interested in what a child is really all about rather than attaching labels to them and making them "fit". His anti-drug stance is commendable and rare in this day and age. Glad to see somebody out there is more interested in helping children achieve their full potential rather than looking for a quick fix DX that renders some children almost catatonic in corners"

Below is an Extract of CCHR's Press Release posted on the msbp board by none other than Penny Mellor. We thought we would archive it in memory of the past actions of CCHR on the msbp board. The press release has Sami Timimi mentioned. He was also the psychiatrist who was speaker at the award ceremony where Penny Mellor was given her CCHR award.

What Sami ought to do is tell the Royal College of Psychiatrists that he is affiliated to an organisation that has commenced war on psychiatry. In addition, I hope he is telling his patients that he is affiliated to such an organisation. Actually, we all think the GMC should know about this. As the GMC visited here last week, we should ask that they take up a referral under the new personal beliefs guidance. Yes, we are of the view that Sami should be investigated by the GMC for his stance in relation to the press release below. The GMC may consider this a formal complaint against him. This is "information received" at the GMC and we expect them to conduct a thorough investigation while disclosing said investigation to his employers. Perhaps the GMC could leave a message here confirming reciept of this complaint.

PRESS RELEASE FROM CCHR as published by Mellor

OVER 1000 CHILDREN IN WEST MIDLANDS FALSELY LABELLED AND DRUGGED BY PSYCHIATRISTS
Added: (Tue Sep 13 2005)

The Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) Birmingham has released figures today collected under the Freedom of Information Act highlighting the psychiatric infiltration into the education system and subsequent damaging of young children?s minds in the West Midlands and Birmingham. Methylphenidate Hydrochloride, more commonly known as Ritalin or Conerta XL, is being falsely presented to parents as a ?treatment? for the spurious Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), despite much condemnation in the medical field as well as official health warnings from recognised institutions such as the United States Food and Drug Administration. Consultant child and adolescent psychiatrist, Dr Sami Timimi, who works full time in the NHS in Lincolnshire, is highly critical of the ADHD diagnosis. He says, "The idea that there is such a thing as a test for ADHD is nonsense. There is no such thing. "Despite the lack of evidence to support the theory that ADHD is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain, and that we as doctors know how to work out which children have that chemical imbalance, despite this just being a theory, it?s entered into popular mythology within the profession and accepted as a truth because it?s the theory that?s needed to justify the prescribing of stimulants." The Birmingham based group has found that over 1100 children in the West Midlands are being prescribed mind altering psychiatric drugs for an alleged condition the existence of which is based solely on opinion, unsupported by any proper scientific evidence. Chris Wrapson spokesperson for the group, stated: ?Psychiatrists are irresponsible. They prescribe mind altering psychotropic drugs in the same classification as cocaine to young children and then claim they have ?cured? an unruly child of his ?condition?. If you were to find a child who is perhaps a little boisterous towards his classmates or has ?ants in his pants?, or sometimes doesn?t pay attention in class, you would say he is merely being a normal healthy energetic child. To say that this constitutes amental illness, and that he has a chemical imbalance of the brain is dishonest. Psychiatry is a pseudoscience, dishing out labels for children based on no scientific evidence, mere opinion, and then giving them mind altering drugs. If a child were given a shot of cocaine, you would probably find them curled up in a ball in the corner, withdrawn, and very quiet, Ritalin is in the same class, and its effects can be devastating?. Local families and education services are affected by the ?expert? opinion of the psychiatrist, often to the detriment of the child himself. Parents of course have only their child?s best interests at heart and may not want to see their child drugged into submission (and worse). However if school denies their child his education unless they consent to this so called ?treatment? they can be pressured into giving their consent albeit unwillingly. The effects are devastating, a once happy adventurous and inquisitive child, can be subverted through the use of mind altering psychotropic drugs and can be found very often, collapsed asleep, fully clothed, sprawled across the landing, in doorways, out like a light. And what of the costs involved with this mass drugging? The average tax payer through his contributions, will be unwittingly financing the 5900 plus items prescribed by local Primary Care Trusts (costing somewhere in the region of £143,000 based on a positive response of only 23% of the trusts contacted who provided this information).

CCHR was established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and Professor of Psychiatry Emeritus and internationally acclaimed author, Dr Thomas Szasz, when the need for intensive reform of psychiatry became apparent. CCHR has exposed hundreds of unexplained or improper deaths in psychiatric institutions, the psychiatric rape of patients, child deaths from exposure to life threatening stimulants and many other human rights abuses.

Anyone with information on adverse reactions to psychiatric drugs (especially from children), or whose children have been diagnosed with ADHD and are concerned, can contact CCHR?s Abuse Line on 0121-523 8185. All confidence will be protected.
Chris Wrapson (Volunteer)

Media Relations Officer
Citizens Commission on Human Rights Birmingham
chris@cchr.org.uk or info@cchr.org.uk
07793 285 784 or 0121 523 8185

Warning - We advise that CCHR is not contacted by anyone vulnerable. While their views seem sympathetic, we have not had any revalidation of their motives.

Update 30th June 2008

Mellor continues to evade the questions asked of her. Today, she presents the CNEP case issues as a distraction for herself. Motormouth herself remains silent on these issues. Penny Mellor and Brian Daniels though appear separately in newspapers and press releases. They do though work together. We present Brian Daniels and our view of his comments.

It amuses us how a number of newspapers fail to tell the world that CCHR is actually the Church of Scientology. We are supposed to believe it supports human rights! We are surprised the press complaints commission allow such a dangerous organisation to sell themselves to the public. This is after the judges in the UK have given Scientology the reputation it deserves.

On the CCHR website Brian Daniels stated as follows

"Raj Persaud's dishonesty makes a mockery of the title doctor in favour of making a quick buck at other people's expense."Dishonesty within the psychiatric industry is coming to light more and more these days and we hope this will serve to warn the public to question and look for themselves not just at a clinical level but at an academic level too"

We must not forget that Brian Daniels is the man Penny Mellor [ the campaigner against David Southall] is linked to. And, on the 5th June 2005, she told a mother, "Here's the scientologists email address cchruk@btconnect.com you want to talk to Brian Daniels and he'll do whatever he can to help you".

So lets see who is judging who. The public should see what kind of organisation is being represented by Mr Brian Daniels. We don't need to say anything about Scientology, we simply have to let the judges tell us what they think of CCHR and Scientology. Pot calling kettle black springs to mind

Justice Anderson, Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia:

"Scientology is evil; its techniques are evil; its practice is a serious threat to the community, medically, morally, and socially; and its adherents are sadly deluded and often mentally ill... (Scientology is) the world's largest organization of unqualified persons engaged in the practice of dangerous techniques which masquerade as mental therapy."

Kenneth Robinson, British Minister of Health:

"The government is satisfied that Scientology is socially harmful. It alienates members of families from each other and attributes squalid and disgraceful motives to all who oppose it; its authoritarian principles and practice are a potential menace to the personality and well being of those so deluded as to become followers; above all, its methods can be a serious danger to the health of those who submit to them... There is no power under existing law to prohibit the practice of Scientology; but the government has concluded that it is so objectionable that it would be right to take all steps within its power to curb its growth."

Federal prosecutor's memorandum to the judge urging stiff jail sentences for 9 top leaders of Scientology who had pleaded guilty to criminal charges:

"The crime committed by these defendants is of a breath and scope previously unheard of. No building, office, desk, or file was safe from their snooping and prying. No individual or organization was free from their despicable conspiratorial minds. The tools of their trade were miniature transmitters, lock picks, secret codes, forged credentials and any other device they found necessary to carry out their conspiratorial schemes."

Justice Latey, ruling in the High Court of London:

"Scientology is both immoral and socially obnoxious...It is corrupt sinister and dangerous. It is corrupt because it is based on lies and deceit and has its real objective money and power for Mr. Hubbard... It is sinister because it indulges in infamous practices both to its adherents who do not toe the line unquestionably and to those who criticize it or oppose it. It is dangerous because it is out to capture people and to indoctrinate and brainwash them so they become the unquestioning captives and tools of the cult, withdrawn from ordinary thought, living, and relationships with others."

Judge Breckenridge, Los Angeles Superior Court:

"[The court record is] replete with evidence [that Scientology] is nothing in reality but a vast enterprise to extract the maximum amount of money from its adepts by pseudo scientific theories... and to exercise a kind of blackmail against persons who do not wish to continue with their sect.... The organization clearly is schizophrenic and paranoid, and this bizarre combination seems to be a reflection of its founder, L.Ron Hubbard."

Lord Denning:

"...capable of such danger that the public interest demands that people should know what is going on"

Judge Constandia Angelaki:

"It is an organization with medical, social and ethical practices that are dangerous and harmful," "It claims to act freely so as to draw members who subsequently undergo ... brainwashing by dictated ways of thinking that limit reaction capabilities."

2nd July 2008 Update.

As the audience can see, it has been nearly 5 days since the post RE Scientology has been placed up. No doubt following the visit from their royal highnesses at CCHR USA, Mellor decided to disconnect. Mellor has been talking about her usual rubbish. She though fails to answer the simple questions put to her above. The audience can come to their own conclusions regarding this. Her behaviour though is typical of a Scientologist - thumping away when they don't have a logical defence.

7th July 2008

So far Mellor has refused to apply her mind to the questions above.
Last week Mellor lost her prized Henshall case at the GMC. She is now attempting ressurection of the case. This website will not be updated until Mellor answers the questions put to her.

2nd August 2008.

1. Mellor has still failed to respond to the above questions.
2. Mellor has lost her case at the GMC
3. Mellor has lost her case at the Attorney General on her allegations of Secret Files.
4. Mellor has lost all her cases so far.

Futhermore, this appeared in our email box. Having positioned our turban, we were amazed. Penny Mellor has still not shown us her psychiatric report.

From: The One Click Group
To: DARETOCARE1@aol.com
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 12:05 AM
Subject: RE: NEWS ON ONE CLICK

We presume this email is from nut job Penny Mellor? We trust this is the case since we are taking the liberty of bccing our reply to several members of parliament, selected media and health activists around the world. We are keeping a file on Penny Mellor that has now reached doorstop proportions. In the fullness of time, we shall take great delight in publishing the contents. Please be advised that any Penny Mellor correspondence in this case entered into with the group may be subject to worldwide publication at our discretion J


With best wishes

The One Click Group

www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk

From: DARETOCARE1@aol.com [mailto:DARETOCARE1@aol.com]
Sent: 31 July 2008 14:50
To: mail@theoneclickgroup.co.uk
Subject: Re: NEWS ON ONE CLICK

oh god the lunatics are all together now. !!

Comprehension Level Poor

Dianetics in Scientology - Please Repeat After Me :)

We all started to laugh today. Mellor stated "the below is just one of many cases to be appealed YEARS "out of time".

1. It is still an " Out of Time" appeal [ which we always stated could be done] on " new evidence".
2. Mellors own case was appealed but FAILED . Actually she was given no leave to appeal.
3. Mellor has no new grounds with which to mount an out of time appeal :) . We welcome her to try it out.
4. She still states that case law can be applied retrospectively :) . Mounting an out of time appeal on "new evidence" is DIFFERENT from considering case law created to change the case law of the past. So basically, the House Lords case recently cannot be used to overturn cases in the past by default!
5. Anyway, we await Mellor's win so we can feature it here. She can prove us all wrong and crow about it. Of course, she will lose. She has lost all her appeals so far :). That makes her a ex felon doesn't it?

Mellor is becoming a little confused and tied in her own arguments. I see she is thumping on her keyboard in a frenzied state - hitting all the right keys but not quite in the right order. We are all surprised that Dianetics has not taught her to thump the keys the right way or in the right order. Perhaps CCHR could send her on some more training sessions on " How the law is applied" or perhaps they could send her to one called " How to Mop Our Floors in a straight line without losing your temper" . Sadly, they keep sending her to the same sessions called
"Repeat after us"

Now lets get back to the important questions Penny Mellor

1. WHAT IS YOUR CONTACT WITH CCHR AND SCIENTOLOGY?
2. WHAT ARE YOUR QUALIFICATIONS?

I think we shall repeat these questions until Mellor answers them. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much. If she had been educated to basic standards then she would stop behaving like Andrew P King Neurotec Executive's fishwife. Note to her father - did anyone send Mellor to finishing school or deportment?

Close Friends - Beverley Hughes MP and Penny Mellor

Beverley Hughes, Minister of State for Children, Young People and Families. Here is old Bev on her website.

More on Bev is listed here.

Beverley does not make it known that she she is well known to Scientology Award Winner Penny Mellor.

In 2001, Mr Gummer stated in Hansard

" Mr. Gummer: The scientologists dignify a pyramid selling ramp with the word "religion", but when I say that, many scientologists will feel that I am stirring up hatred against them. Frankly, I am not trying to stir up hatred; I just do not want people to be led astray by that invention by Lafayette Ron Hubbard, who, as I understand it, made a lot of money out of it. If the Bill is passed in its present form, a lot of other people will call a lot of other ramps religion and protect themselves accordingly. I do not think that the Government know what they are doing. They are restricting people's right to point to sheer, outrageous, unbelievably wicked dishonesty".

Beverley responded as follows

" Beverley Hughes: I do not accept that. As the right hon. Gentleman knows, the provision contains operational safeguards, as do the provisions on incitement to racial hatred. The clause establishes a public order offence; it will require the Attorney-General's consent. I do not share the right hon. Gentleman's fears that cults such as scientology will be the subject of offences under the provision.

THE EMAIL FROM A SOURCE REGARDING MELLOR AND HUGHES

From: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Beverly Hughes
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 23:22:01 +1000
>
A short while ago Penny Mellor disclosed that Beverly Hughes M.P. and Minister for Children had arranged for her to be transferred to a prison near her home when she was serving her sentence and that Hughes was now her close friend and ally.

> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> I am prepared to be corrected but I do not believe Mellor is one of Hughes's
> constituents and this would appear to be a strange association and action by
> Hughes..

Mellor on Overturning Oscar Wilde's Verdict

"There is no sin except stupidity"

Oscar Wilde was a wise man. I believe it would amused him to think Penny Mellor was now thinking of reversing his verdict. To recap, Mellor told us that all modern case law had a retrospective application :).

She failed to understand the basics of " Precedent". It states "In common law legal systems, a precedent or authority is a legal case establishing a principle or rule that a court or other judicial body adopts when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts."

Oscar Wilde once stated "What we have to do, what at any rate it is our duty to do, is to revive the old art of Lying". Mellor does revive the old art of lying well.

Mellor will no doubt be aware that a personality disorder is not a mental illness. Her colleagues Sami and Breggin would have taught her the basics of that. Perhaps they have just taught her about being a parrot of CCHR as well. She is certainly feathery and rather repetitive. Today, she places David Southall's CV online yet again. She points out all the matters that Field Fisher Waterhouse checked out. Everything Mellor states regarding his CV are actually large fibs. We often wonder what the IQ of a CCHR parrot is.

We thought we would also present some of Mellor's crowings on her failed appeal. The audience should not that these emails are from 2005. It is now 2008 and Mellor still does not have a result. Now, what was that she said about retrospective application of case law? If CCHR has hired Mellor, we should ask ourselves which of the parties was the short sighted one. As Mellor will now know, surrounding herself with people with title and repute does not make her intelligent. Intelligence is not gained by osmosis.

1. From: DARETOCARE1@aol.com
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 06:41:25 -0400
Subject: Re: What I think
To:

As my case is going back to appeal, we'll see who conned who shall we.


2. From: DARETOCARE1@aol.com
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:24:55 -0400
Subject: Re: What I think
To:

wrong again, my criminal case is being appealed by my co-defendants as part of their case, nothing to do with me and that has ONLY just happened in the last two weeks. No conspiracy, however the entire email content will be made public in court to prove they targetted certain individuals with less evidence than they had on others.

For reference to Mellor's rantings.

"There is a time-limit of 28 days from the date of sentence (Meaning the date the Jury returned it’s verdict) within which any application by a Law Officer for leave to refer must be lodged with the Registrar of Criminal Appeals: Schedule 3(1) CJA 1988 (Archbold, 7-306)"

The 28 day time limit is absolute: there is no power at all to extend it or to apply for leave to refer out of time."

"Extension of time may be of two kinds: (a) extension of time in which to give notice of application for leave to appeal or notice of appeal or (b) extension of time in which to renew an application refused by the single judge. An application for extension of the 28 day period in which to give notice of application for leave to appeal or notice of appeal must always be supported by reasons why the application for leave was not submitted in time"

Royal Courts of Justice - Criminal Appeals Division - Document for Counsel/Solicitors :)

I believe that makes Mellor's appeal out of time. So who conned who then? Answers on a postcard please :). We shall monitor this though and see if Mellor wins her point. She won't though because she is the large parrot with the Scientology trained brain. We could call her an android parrot but alas that may just be insulting to androids.

EX CRIMINAL MOPS UP

Can Penny Mellor Use a Mop?

1. Today Mellor writes as follows "posting was met with a certain amount of amusement amongst my barrister friends"

2. On the 24th June 2008 she stated "After I had applied for full disclosre of his involvement in my arrest and subsequent charge, I already had the list of known associates provided by Southall, Guy Whitburn refused me the right to face my accuser" . Mellor feels she can go back to the case and get a number of pieces of information from the trial :)

3. We should note that Mellor's case failed.

4. We also know that Mellor's appeal failed.

5. We also know that there are no appeals at all now against the original sanction by the criminal courts. Any appeal would be out of time. The Davis case law does not apply to Mellor :)

6. Mellor cites that retrospective use of the case law in Davis is possible :). If this is so then all cases since the advent of the courts that have had anonymous witnesses could be appealed :). So all cases at the the Old Bailey Courthouse. London's Central Criminal Court from 1673 and onwards should now be appealed :) on the basis of case law made recently. This means that the Criminal Review Commission should be dealing with all cases since 1673. As usual Mellor cites 2 untested cases as her defence. They are though untested :). There isn't any doubt that those cases going in time for appeal would be able to use the R v Davis (Appellant) (On appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)). No one is disputing this. Mellor's own case though is over and done and completely out of time. In any event, David Southall was irrelevant in her conviction. Mellor can of course test out her bizarre theories, she won't win. Thats because she has never won a case on her own in her life. She needs some scientology input.

7. We have no idea which barristers are advising Mellor but they clearly have a very poor understanding of the law. Case law created now cannot be used to change case law in the past. If that were so, the courts would be oversubscribed and unable to cope. In addition, creating new case law every day would create the reopening of cases in previous years. That is illogical. Then Mellor is illogical. That is a fact. If what Mellor says was true, we could change the outcome of Oscar Wilde's trial by the use of libel case law today :).

8. As Mellor has bullshitted about her appeal repeatedly, talked about the Attorney General considering it etc etc, we will find that this statement of Mellor's today will come to nothing as well as she will never succeed in overturning Judge Whitburn's judgment. She can prove us wrong if she wishes.

As usual Mellor runs to her barrister friends and is unable at all to analyse issues for herself. She is of course unable to analyse her facts correctly. We dread to think what she has been doing with vulnerable mothers. If she wasn't a housewife and she went back to school to get her qualifications, she may have been able to think with her brain. As usual she wants to cheat. Mind you her legal advisers are just as airheadish as she is. Well, they must be to take a woman like her seriously.

Perhaps her legal advisers [ in this case Andrew " Beam Me Up" Scotty] could give us their view on the following

a. Does the Bar Council regulations permit associations with ex criminals? Not to mention use the lady as a conduit to leaking information about cases to the media and on the internet?
b. Is Andrew Scott qualified to diagnose a personality disorder :) ?
c. Did Mellor have any relationship with Hemming MP?
d. Is Andrew Scott a Scientologist ? Is Bill Bache a Scientologist?
e. What are Mellor's exact qualifications? Lets have the list
f. What is Mellor's exact relationship with the Church of Scientology? It is established that Mellor has been turned into a clone by them. The Church clearly failed to educate her in the basics of Science. Mind you, like Ron Hubbard, she spews out Science Fiction so they have something in common. Well, he must be such an inspiration when "psychs are struck off" with their help.

If Mellor knew her case law, she wouldn't have been serving time a prison near her family. Wasn't the transfer arranged by your old friend Bev in the Government?

Now where were we in considering the employment of a person with a criminal record. We had a post some time ago stating the following. The post stated as follows :-

"Now come on, even to clean floors these days you need basic exams. You have to get the dilution of cleaning fluid to water exactly right, or it is just one big sticky mess. Then of course you need a fairly good IQ to manage to fill in the stock request forms" LD

Perhaps suggesting a cleaning job with Molly Maids was aiming to her. What would LD suggest?

Airhead

Mellor tells us this today "Justice Guy Whitburn: " I am affording Professor David Southall Public Interest Immunity" After I hadThe case isn't mine" applied for full disclosre of his involvement in my arrest and subsequent charge, I already had the list of known associates provided by Southall, Guy Whitburn refused me the right to face my accuser"Not anymore honey, now I get to find out EXACTLY what went on". She quotes the latest House of Lords case, R v Davis (Appellant) (On appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)).

As for the case law on criminal trials, errrrm can someone tells the old bat that its not retrospective :)>

Of the Clark case, she states "The case isn't mine". Really, thats why we know the contacts between Mellor and the Clark case *wink*

She then states "'ll just hand it over to the police when I have my meeting with a certain Chief Constable eh". Would that be Mellors Scientology Police Officer friend? Didn't Mellor admit to knowing "bent officers" in the police force. Ah yes, we must dig that email out must we :).

Penny Mellor's Employment Prospects [ With a Criminal Record]

We all decided [ all 5 of us] that Mellor really needed a purpose in life. We decided that Andrew P King, Neurotec Tycoon was just not enough for Mellor's needs. As a bored and desperate housewife, we felt she would want to get into the employment sector. The above leaflet is available at http://www.jobcentreplus.gov.uk . It basically assists those with criminal records. Mellor as we know has a criminal record for conspiracy to abduct a child. We would also suggest night school to further her educational failings. She may wish to try http://www.learndirect.co.uk

Afterall, if she is headed hunted by the top dogs in Scientology, she really needs to live up to their reputation. You would think the bods at Scientology HQ would have had the intelligence to hire someone without a criminal record and with some basic education. Dear me! Perhaps if CCHR is an employer, they could employ her as floor cleaner or something. As for the audience, off you go to this website http://www.cchr.org.uk/.

CCHR has a video about how they get " msbp psychs struck off". We would publish it but you know how CCHR is addicted to copyright violation accusations. We only have to look at their complaint in Raj Persaud's case. But we must not forget the intrepid Dr Patrick Cosgrove who knew all about CCHR. Mellor would know all about that as she helped them do it. Apart from sweeping their floors and making cups of tea, she has been using her dyson to hoover up all the psychiatrists from the Royal College of Psychiatrists.

Seriously, we would all pick someone better looking, with better intellect and with a better eye for grammar and website design. Is she the current weakest link linked to CCHR? Well, only CCHR can tell us that. As we say, she could be more suited to tea girl or floor cleaner! At least she knows where all the dirt is.

A member of CCHR is as follows :). Nice art, shame about the choice of cult.

Fraser Kee Scott
Director
A Gallery
New works by rising stars in contemporary art
www.agallery.co.uk
www.myspace.com/frasersworld

Diamonds

Yes everyone understood the Scoring System apart from Penny Mellor. Perhaps if she concentrated more on books and less on diamonds, she may be able to understand them too. Again she places documents that mean nothing. Now where was that story that Totally Disgusted mentioned. Ah yes, here it is.

We quote Totally Disgusted

"I guess the question should be raised as to what will come sooner... David Southall in Prison over the evidence provided by Penny Mellor, or Penny Mellor charged with slander for all the times she attacks people and makes comments that are incorrect and untruthful?

I certainly know where I'd put my money"

To Totally Disgusted

Penny Mellor has no insight into the fact she is losing her pet case in the GMC Courts. We have just had information that in 2004 she harassed Prof Sibert who then decided it was too unsafe for him to give evidence in the Clark case [ GMC]. Witness intimidation eh. It is a great shame that the GMC did not take this up with the police.

Mellor is going to have to deny this and we are going to have to place all the documentation on this issue right up on the internet. Mellor tries to interfere with trials. She admitted to once knowing some of the jury. Sabotaging hearings is her speciality.

Judge Whitburn "It was very significant that that was the one aspect on which you admitted telling lies to the police"

This is not Penny Mellor's Backside.
Her backside is reputed to be has large as her mouth

Penny Mellor has now written two posts on her blog with the title "The Truth and Nothing But the Truth". It is a shame she admitted to lying to the police. Ah yes and for all those who do not believe us, we need to go back into the time machine and take a look at Mellor's judgment. Whitburn also termed Mellor a " dangerous eccentric". We have invited a few psychiatrists to join onto this blog. They will be posting in the next few weeks. Psychiatrists are of course people with views and are entitled to comment on the David Southall Exposed website. The psychiatrists from the US and India and a few from the UK are wild about this blog. Apparently, we provide them with hours of entertainment [ we aim to please!].

Their starting point is an analysis of criminal behaviour in the judgment below. Mellor always says she is innocent but we know she is simply a guilty fishwife who clearly misled the family and got them into a huge amount of trouble. There is nothing heroic about this case and Mellor failed her appeal [ although she has variations on a theme of what happened to this]. One of her crowing stories is about the case being considered by the Attorney General. This is simply her bullshitting again because she does that best. A neighbouring website referred to the story of the boy who cried wolf too many times.

So lets go back in time and review her judgment. Welcome down memory lane. Thankyou to the audience for returning to our parodies of Penny Mellor. Rumour even has it that Finlay Scott of the GMC may be dissociating from this group. That may be just a rumour or it may be true. Who knows.

IN THE CROWN COURT AT NEWCASTLE

Ref: T20010758

The Crown Court
Quayside
Newcastle Upon Tyne

21st March 2002

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE WHITBURN QC

REGINA v PENELOPE MELLOR

SENTENCE

APPEARANCES:

For the Prosecution: MR. C. KNOX
For the Defence: MR. T. PARKIN

JUDGE WHITBURN: Penelope Mellor, please stand.
Penelope Mellor, you were convicted by a jury of a wicked conspiracy to abduct [XXXX] in February 1999.

A woman of ability, determination and tenacity, you have been a self-appointed advocate for those, amongst others, whose children are taken into care on the basis of what was known as Munchausens Syndrome By Proxy, now known as Fictitious Illness Syndrome. Your view, expressed to the Jury, was that this was a misdiagnosis, designed to cover up medical negligence.

Impervious to debate, convinced you are right, you have traduced, complained about and harried dedicated professional people working in this difficult area. I do not punish you for that, let me make it clear, however tiresome and eccentric your views are, the toleration afforded to you who expressed them, by those who hear them, is part of the price we gladly pay for living in a liberal democracy.

What is unforgivable is the way in which you manipulated for your own, as I find, purposes, the genuine distress of the [XXXX] family. I am quite sure that before they visited you, mother, grandmother and child, on that fateful weekend towards the end of January 1999, that there was never any plan to abduct the child to Ireland, so as to keep the child away from Social Services in Sunderland.

Steps were taken, monies were drawn, tickets obtained, and this only after another long early morning call by you. It was you who put them in touch with [XXXX], and it was he who visited you before catching the ferry to Ireland and meeting up there with [XXXX] and [XXXX]. It was very significant that that was the one aspect on which you admitted telling lies to the police. He then of course took the grandmother and child to Scotland, and then orchestrated the non-negotiable demands, to effectively ransom the child.

The child was kept away, and despite being with her grandmother, she must have been, and as the Pre-Sentence Report clearly says, disorientated and confused. She was kept away for over a month. You said in evidence that you were thought by some to be the Svengali, the one who pulled the strings, but that you only empowered those caught up in such a case by giving them the tools to fight.

In this case I have no doubt, having seen you giving evidence and having the whole of the case, that you were the architect, the Svengali of the whole plan. [XXXX], her mother and her husband, would never have been part of any conspiracy to abduct had they not met you, you counselled and advised them, and as a result encouraging them throughout this conspiracy.

I am sure that on the evidence, only as a result, they embarked on that fateful course, which inevitably led to all three, of hitherto good character, serving sentences of imprisonment; mother and grandmother nine months, and father, who played a lesser role, six months, they readily followed where you had pointed.

As the Court of Appeal Criminal Division pointed out in dismissing the appeals of [XXXX] and [XXXX] and [XXXX], those who act as you and they did commit a serious offence, especially where what is done is to thwart the orders of the Court in respect of a child or proceedings taken in respect of a child, by removing the child from the jurisdiction of the Court and assisting the continuing absence of that child from the jurisdiction.

It is, and it is to be emphasised, the interests of the child which are paramount. It is chilling to read in the Pre-Sentence Report the effect of that abduction upon that already emotionally damaged child. You have made clear your cavalier disregard for the injunction of the High Court, viewing them as gagging orders preventing what you regard as the truth from emerging. Certain it is that you were pursuing your own agenda; the difficulties of the [XXXX] family, their emotional fragility, their suffocating love for their children fitted in well with the campaign that you were waging.

A woman of 40, hitherto good character, a mother of eight children, ranging from an adult to a small baby, any Court must pause and anxiously consider whether a custodial is inevitable. Sadly, I have done so, and it is.

I take into account all the personal matters of mitigation urged upon me. I have considered the Pre-Sentence Report, which so well sets out your background, and I am most grateful to Mr Parkin who has pleaded your case so eloquently.

What you are being punished for is orchestrating an abduction of a child, in part at least for your own propaganda purposes; an abduction which lasted over a month, and was only resolved at considerable cost of scarce Police resources and by good detective work. An abduction which cost others, who were unlikely to have participated without your encouragement, their liberty.

The very least sentence I can pass upon you, Penelope Mellor, is two years’ imprisonment. Of that you will serve half. Take her down. I make no order for costs.

Pineapple Upside Down Pudding - A Example of Penny Mellor's Way of Thinking

Penny Mellor - Presenting her Facts Upside Down

We continue the series on Penny Mellor's house wifery skills today. We hypothesise further that Mellor is rather good at Pineapple Upside Down Pudding. The reason is that her entire website contains various facts put in the wrong order and on each occasion - upside down. As Eric Morcambe would say " All the right notes but not necessarily in the right order". In dedication to her brain type, Penny Mellor we hope will take up this recipe of Pineapple Upside Down Pudding.

We refer to the BBC Cookery website for their Pineapple Upside Down Pudding. It should be renamed as the Mellor Upside Down Pudding. Perhaps we could add a few sprinklings of the fruitcake ingredients into it.

An interesting example of upside down logic and the fact that Mellor cannot keep her story straight is this.

On the 16th June 2008 she said the following on her blog "There has been criticism of my posting the "odd" document instead of entire protocols, well there is a very good reason for that and it is this, this blog was not set up to inform the public, this blog was set up specifically to let Southall know that I know, he and his cohorts will know from the "odd" document exactly what I now have by way of evidence and I know David reads my blog!"

On the 22nd June 2008 she states as follows "For the benefit of my readers, this was obtained through legal channels"

According to her, the blog was only written for David Southall. There should therefore only be one reader. As David Southall is currently at a hearing and not reading her blog, that leaves no readers [ by her own admission].

It is of course good that she admits to Bill Bache or related lawyers leaking out information to her. That is contrary to Law Society Guidance.

Upside Down Pineapple Pudding :). A dedication to Mellor's way of thinking - if we can call it that.

Ingredients
55g/2oz caster sugar
55g/2oz unsalted butter
55g/2oz self-raising flour
2 eggs
handful of cashew nuts
55g/2oz caster sugar
55g/2oz pineapple rings, cut into chunks
drizzle of vanilla essence
drizzle of cream, to serve

Method
1. Preheat the oven to 220C/425F/Gas 7.
2. Cream the sugar and butter together in a food processor until pale and fluffy. Add the flour, eggs and cashew nuts and blend again to combine.
3. Heat the sugar in an oven-proof pan until a caramel has formed. Add the pineapple chunks and vanilla essence and shake the pan to coat.
4. Spoon the sponge mixture on top of the caramelised pineapple and then transfer to the oven and bake for 15-20 minutes, or until golden brown and springy to the touch.
5. Turn the pudding out onto a serving plate and drizzle with cream to serve.

Show me more pineapple recipes
Show me more Paul Rankin recipes

Grandiosity and Attention Seeking Behaviour

Penny Mellor tells the world at large today :-

"So let's remind everyone when people began to take notice shall we"

We should remind the audience. This is what Mellor once said in an email Tue, 4 Oct 2005 12:17:54 -0400

"In the not too distant future the entire country will see what I have been working on and perhaps then you'll all realise the the universe doesn't revolve around xxxxxxxxxxx"

At the time, we asked does this fit with the following?

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following^[1]:

1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes that he or she is "special" and unique
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement
6. is interpersonally exploitative
7. lacks empathy
8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitude

17 psychiatrists and related doctors voted in at yes. 2 voted in at " do not know" and 1 left a message that was rather offensive to Mellor.

She then writes as follows

"I won't shut up until David goes to prison, just as I state at the start of this blog"

We say, it could be a long long wait. I mean we can imagine her waiting at her keyboard in the year 2040 - old and withered while David Southall is sunning himself in the South of France. The only person that has seen the four walls of a prison is Penny Mellor. Penny has a criminal record. David has no criminal record. That is interesting isn't it?

Penny Mellor's addiction to David Southall

Just to say that we have spotted Mellor back to her running commentary on David Southall. It seems she has to do so at least once a day only deviating to speak to Rita Pal.

We see that she has brought up her children well. One of them seems to be making an obscene sign to the world. Clearly money cannot buy good behaviour in her children. One cannot expect anything else more from a fishwife who clearly spends even her Sundays dreaming about David Southall. She may well like to spend that time teaching her children some manners.

It is only a shame Mellor cannot interprete and understand the documents in her possession. It provides high level entertainment for us to observe what she comes up with next. She is clearly making more combinations of her Mellor original fruitcake recipe. The pathological obsession with David Southall seems to be ongoing now. Perhaps this is what we call Fatal Attraction, who knows.

Our psychiatrists inform us that the analysis here is this - by saying David Southall is guilty all the time, Mellor has a reason to concentrate on his documents . She does not seem to be able to let go. If she cannot have him, all that remains is the documents. This is the kind of phenomena seen in victims who cannot let go of their fixed ideas. Because they do not have a life themselves, they tend to gather their documents and repeatedly go through them again and again. It gives those without a purpose in life - some kind of purpose. Mellor's life revolves around David Southall, some would call it an unhealthy obsession. The matters she raises have been rehearsed in forum after forum, within various complaints system and they have been thrown out. Mellor though continues to re-rehearse them continually in different forums. She has done so for about 10 years now.

In conclusion, Penny Mellor is unable to let go of David Southall, continues to talk to him on the internet as a running commentary.

"On a completely different subject, our discussion on some interesting personality disorders was discussed in detail. Here is another interesting section that may be familiar to some people.

"Narcissistic rages are based on fear and will endure even after the threat is gone.^[3] To the narcissist, the rage is directed towards the person that they feel has slighted them; to other people, the rage is incoherent and unjust. This rage impairs their cognition, therefore impairing their judgment. During the rage they are prone to shouting, fact distortion and making groundless accusations. It’s believed that narcissists have two layers of rage. The first layer of rage can be thought of as a constant anger (towards someone else), and the second layer being a self-aimed wrath. Two specific identified forms of narcissistic rage are explosive and passive-aggressive. The explosive form being an obvious anger, for example, damaging property (or people) and being verbally abusive. The passive-aggressive sort might be sulking or giving their target the silent treatment. They can become enraged to the point of being homicidal especially if he/she has the need to seek revenge.^[4]"

Scientology Money

Some people work for their money and take the effort to be educated. Other simply harvest it through a cult religion. Rich girl, rich car, rich man but lacking in education and intellect. Well, in legendary Wolverhampton housewives only have to campaign to be paid handsomely. Thats if they have a long hobbie of fishing for doctors and any professional that disagrees with her. Perhaps she should stick to baking fruitcakes. At least she may be able to get names of the ingredients right from Walmart. That should be the start of rehabilitation in her aim at being a good housewife. That must be her aim as a basic education isn't.

Totally Disgusted wrote to us recently. This is what she said

"I'm feeling a little put out over here.... Firstly I'm accused of being Rita Pal and now I'm someone else. Will Mellor ever get her facts right and do a little research before publishing her slanderous remarks? Surely she must realise that the more she is consistently incorrect, the less credible she becomes. Of course, I was being a little generous there in assuming that she had some credibility to begin with :-)"

TD - yes, you were rather generous. Remember she has the education of a 10 year old and the rest is what we term " bullshitting" well.

Message to EC - All points noted. Please accept our apology. Best Wishes to you.

BAKING FRUITCAKES

All housewives should learn how to bake. That is my view as a man. I love cakes. In my view, a woman who is a all rounder bakes well. We wondered whether Penny Mellor could actually cook. In our view, given the current incoherent diatribe on her website, we postulate the hypothesis that she is indeed a bad cook. We say this because she places all her ingredients together but not quite in the right order. As someone once said, she isn't the sharpest tool in the box. Penny Mellor should though start with a fruitcake recipe - to improve her cookery skills of course. It is rumoured that her last man Mr Devlin choked all the way to work one afternoon due to the severe lack of cooking skills. Perhaps these days, the Scientologists pay for a maid for her. Scientologists would be a dab hand at baking fruitcakes. Apparently, they do it all the time. The sentence contruction today is even more dire than it was in the past. Perhaps she could try this fruitcake if she hasn't already. That is of course if she hasn't got a bun in the oven first.

As Penny continues to to have a running commentary with her two favourite people - David Southall and Rita Pal, perhaps she could ask both of them to come bake cakes with her. They may be able to show her how to put the ingredients in the bowl the right way round. A psychiatrist once said "These productions are not altogether destitute of merit; but the enormous number suggest the idea that the world must have been for ages nothing more than a bloody battlefield on which she was the chief destroyer". Perhaps baking will enable Mellor to feel a little better about her obsessional ideas on David Southall and Rita Pal.

From Whats Cooking in America.

"Fruitcakes should be made well in advance of the time that they will be used. One month of storage is a necessity. Two, three, or even four months is not too long a time if the storage facilities are cool and dry.

Fruitcakes freeze very well. However, they must be aged at least four weeks before freezing, as they do not mellow while they are frozen.

Take several days to make your cake or cakes. prepare the nuts and fruits, pour the liquor to be used over them, and let the mixture stand well covered for two or three days. Then make the batter and bake your cakes. The cakes will be better and the pressure in a busy household will be eased.

Always bake fruitcakes at a low temperature, no higher than 325 degrees and preferably much lower. Line the pans with brown paper or waxed paper to prevent the cakes from burning during the long baking time. Always place a pan of hot water on the floor of the oven. This prevents the cakes from drying out. Test for doneness with a cake tester inserted in the center of the cake. It will come out moist, but not doughy, when the cake is done.

Cool fruitcakes on a rack in the pans in which they were baked. When cakes are cooled, turn them out of the pans and carefully peel off the paper. If you are not decorating the cakes before storing them, wrap them in cheesecloth. Sprinkle liberally with whatever liquor or wine was used in the recipe. Seal the cakes in plastic wrap or in plastic storage bags. Once a week, brush the cakes with more liquor.

Perhaps the most important, don't feel absolutely bound by a recipe. If the recipe calls for brandy and you don't have it (or like it), use wine or even a fruit juice of your choice. If the recipe calls for citron and you don't care for citron, substitute another candied or dried fruit. If you don't like raisins, use more chopped dates and fewer raisins. If the recipe calls for particular amounts of candied pineapple and cherries, the same weight of a fruit mix may be used. The important thing to keep in mind is that the weight of fruit and nuts should be approximately the same as in the original recipe. Within this boundary, you can make substitutions of your own choice"

RIGHT ANGLES TO REALITY

There is a serious problem with Penny Mellor. We were left a message through this blog today. The message contained a post by Totally Disgusted.

She had written the following on her blog aptly labelled Where Is Dr Pal?

"So Penny, each time you claim that this blog is written and owned by Rita, you are only making a fool of yourself to the people who know who I am. It proves that your level of research is unsubstantiated allegations and calls into question the authenticity of any research you do. Please learn to get your facts right before making anymore comments about my blog".

Yes you tell her Totally Disgusted. You tell her that she fails to see whats right in front of her.
Imagine what she does with CNEP. You say " No it isn't" , she says " Oh yes it is" and we could just have a pantomine right on here couldn't we. TD - whether you are a guy or gal, just remember that old Penny's brain has been messed up by all sorts of substances. Nicotine is one such substance.

By the way, where is Dr Pal these days? This is where she is http://www.nhsexposedblog.blogspot.com .Imagine that. Oh, and she writes her name on the side identifying herself as one of the bloggers. That should give you a huge clue.

So lets recap for Penny Mellor for the millionth time.

1. Where Is Dr Pal is written by Totally Disgusted. Totally Disgusted has nothing to do with us.
2. http://www.nhsexposedblog.blogspot.com is written by Dr Rita Pal and Simon Ford.
3. http://www.wickedconpirator.blogspot.com is written by Steve Singhal and Friends.
4. http://www.realitylapse.blogspot.com was written by Paul Heathcote. How do we know that? Well we are techs as well and we know Paul Heathcote placed what he thought to be Dr Pal's home address online. Paul Heathcote may be of the view that he was anoymous but he wasn't. Scientology addled your brain Paul eh? Its all gone a bit skewy, hasn't it mate. Hanging around Mellor and Morgan will do that to you. Aligning himself to those with personality issues rubs off really. Shall we get one of our psychiatrist friends to hop over to Totally Disgusted's website and consider why you are claiming incapacity benefit while doing work on the side. Pubs are great things especially in Sheffield.

Thankyou to our psychiatrist friends in Oz, India, US and the UK for their input on this blog.

NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS WASTE MONEY ON BRIAN MORGAN's PET HOBBY

Diagnose and Be Damned shows the following

"The National Union of Journalists paid costs of £25 000 when it funded Morgan in his failed attempt to have Payne's purloined documents made public. Morgan states there is no formal organisation, merely a "loose network of contacts" and "a grapevine."

Justice for Families states as follows

Brian Morgan -

This struggle cost Brian Morgan's union, the NUJ, £50,000.

A few days ago, the National Union of Journalists featured on NHS Behind the Headlines. Apparently they are not "standing by Brian Morgan" any longer.

The blog also startlingly cites Morgan as a cyberstalker and harasser. The mails sent to the blog owner can only be written by someone with serious personality issues. Given this statement, is Brian Morgan safe to be a supporter of Justice For Families. The group seems to consist of a serial philanderer and a stalker. No doubt Penny Mellor will provide support from first hand evidence of being in prison.

Perhaps next time Brian Morgan could ask the Scientologists to fund his pet hobby. It might be worth while rather than abusing the funds of hard working journalists. Then Morgan has to rely on other hard working journalists as he isn't one.

Brian Morgan's Policed Past

Child abuse inquiry journalist
is now under arrest

By Paul Taylor: Chief reporter
Sunderland Echo

Police have arrested an investigative journalist who was involved in exposing a child abuse controversy surrounding a Sunderland family.

Brian Morgan 59, a freelance and photo-journalist since 1985, who also produces TV
documentaries and reports, was arrested at his office in Cardiff on Thursday morning, by two detectives who had travelled there from Sunderland. Along with a third officer from South Wales, they told Mr Morgan he was under suspicion of conspiring with the Sunderland family to keep a child out of official custody and seized his computer and various documents.

Mr Morgan denied committing any offence before being taken to Cardiff’s Fairwater police station and interviewed. He was released on bail, to report to a Sunderland police station later this month.

A Northumbria Police spokeswoman said: “A Cardiff man was arrested by police in connection with conspiracy to abduct a child. He is currently on police bail, pending further inquires.” But the police declined to comment on statement by Mr Morgan’s solicitor, Clayton Williams, who said: “It is a very serious issue for journalism, and freedom of speech and expression if, as Brian advises me, he is involved purely because of his interest as a journalise.” He added that if police could not produce irrefutable proof that Mr Morgan had done anything other than a legitimate job of investigative journalism, their actions raised serious issues about freedom of speech.

Mr Morgan assisted the Echo in reporting the controversy behind the story of a local family who had a child taken into care after two paediatricians voiced a suspicion that the child’s illnesses may have been induced by adult relations.

Mr Morgan has devoted his working life throughout the 1990s to investigating and reporting on a disputed diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy, which initially was suspected in the Sunderland case, although it did not form the basis of care decision.

Dora Black, Mandy Morris and the Kingdom of Psychiatrists

The important issue to understand about psychiatrists is that they have quite a bit of control in the way the world works. We suspect this is what Scientologists dislike. They dislike the power psychiatrists have. As the world is now, psychiatrists have rather more power than the average scientologist. This does not mean that a sector of psychiatrists who dislike Scientology cannot influence the way the world works. Afterall, at the present time, the police have a great respect for forensic psychiatrists as they tend to put the various pieces together.

Psychiatrists have often been critical of Scientology. That is probably because we can postulate that Scientologists may well have personality disorders themselves. Psychiatrists certainly think so. Penny Mellor is well known for her close association with CCHR having featured their press releases repeatedly and done a large amount of work for them thereby gaining herself a Scientology Award. Her behaviour is similar to a scientologist. The transference and control of this behaviour to other people results in similar behaviour patterns. Mellor is very easy to study much as a lab rat over the cyberspace. She is a very easy and interesting subject for many psychiatrists. Mellor tells us she is not mentally ill but simply criminally minded. This does not prevent psychiatrists from observing the manner in which she conducts herself. Observation is the key to many research papers.

We take Amanda Morris for instance. Who is Amanda Morris we ask ourselves? Well, Amanda Morris is the complainant in David Southall's case - December 2007. She is also a inveterate liar. We can only use the word Liar because that is the term hinted at.

Dora Black is an eminent psychiatrist. She specialises in the following

Medical competence and negligence
Medical malpractice and accidents
Therapeutic misadventure
Trauma assessment and sequelae, inc. personal injury
Psychosomatic disorders and Munchausen
Violence, self-harm and suicide
PTSD / Post-traumatic stress disorder in children
Behavioural psychology
Eating disorders, bulimia and anorexia nervosa
Family and child issues
Child adoption, foster care and wardship
Child custody, access and residence
Psychological effects of divorce and separation
Criminal assault and CICA claims

Dora Black is a well thought of Psychiatrist and knows people in the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Dora Black isn't stupid of course. Despite Amanda Morris's protestations to the contrary, it was established that Penny Mellor had been in close contact with her. This can be observed in the case related to Debbie Henshall as well. Both deny contact with Penny Mellor but the evidence is rather different when examined properly. The fact remains Debbie Henshall and Mandy Morris are both Penny Mellor's friends. They lie about her to provide the authorities with the impression that the complaints are made independently. They aren't of course.

It is therefore clear that Penny Mellor controls both these puppets. Simplicity is not Penny Mellor's forte and any psychiatrist would be interested in the conduct of these women. It is simply much like women dancing around their handbags but instead they all lie together about identical things. The behaviour patterns of all these women are very similar. The main issue is this, they can fool the world but they cannot fool a group of psychiatrists.

Psychiatrists know about lies, that's why Amanda Morris was called a LIAR and is one. Amanda Morris knows Dora Black very well indeed. Dora Black knows Amanda Morris very well indeed. The problem with knowing each other from the past is the future becomes more transparent. It becomes more transparent for Penny Mellor anyway.

Amanda Morris or Mandy Morris as she is termed affectionately is working as a nurse in Australia. For anyone wishing to release Dora Black's report to Australia or even this document is free to do so. The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council will certainly wish to know about Dora Black's assessment of Mandy Morris. Is Mandy Morris going to declare it or shall members of this audience declare it. Is Mandy Morris Fit to Practise as a nurse? Is a Liar Fit to Practise and is she fit to be left with vulnerable people. This is our question because the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council will want to be aware of all her past. A friend of ours went down there the other day. Its a nice place with a nice Professional Code of Conduct.

If we look at the Professional Code of Conduct, we observe point 3 particularly

A nurse must not bring discredit upon the reputation of the nursing profession.

• The actions of a nurse in their personal life may have an adverse impact on their reputation and on the profession, and may have adverse therapeutic outcomes.
• The conduct of a nurse must at all times maintain and build public trust and confidence in the profession.

We ask ourselves whether lying may bring "discredit upon the profession". As they say on Wisteria Lane, it is the past that makes sense of the future. For CCHR and Scientology, lying is a way of life. For Penny Mellor, lying is a way of life. For everyone associated with Penny Mellor, the line between truth and lies is blurred. In their views, the end justifies the means. Our dilemna at present is shall we ask our Australian colleague to pop the report from North Staffordshire NHS Trust into the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council or shall we simply sit on the report. Our thanks to our own Sharon Payne lookalike at the legal offices for copying the internal report to us. Unlike Sharon Payne, our clerical worker wore a short skirt. It is all about contacts really and we have them. It is much like Fiona Wollard and her Royal Brompton Hospital connections. Amazing how much photocopying can be done when no one notices. We have always said, North Staffordshire NHS Trust cannot protect their data. Mellor knows how easy it is to obtain copies of documents. Many people can play the same game as Mellor and her outfit.

Obsessional Focus

This is what Mellor once said in an email Tue, 4 Oct 2005 12:17:54 -0400

"In the not too distant future the entire country will see what I have been working on and perhaps then you'll all realise the the universe doesn't revolve around xxxxxxxxxxx"

Does this fit with the following

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following^[1]:

1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes that he or she is "special" and unique
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement
6. is interpersonally exploitative
7. lacks empathy
8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitude

Penny Mellor's behaviour is such that it provides far more intriguing obsessional traits. They are more like fixations. The Forensic Psychiatrist may well be intrigued by this. For instance, she is told that Rat experimentation is not applicable to humans, she denies this is the case. She is told that Debbie Henshall is a liar and shown the evidence. She denies this as well. She is told that she is her protocols confused. She is told a number of things about CNEP but she still fixates on the same obsessional ideas she has had for many years. We have told her who writes this blog, she is still in denial. It is probably much like the fact she denies she is unintelligent.

She still continues to write her bizarre ideas. Journalists have left messages on this blog citing their opinions on Penny Mellor's personality. Various independent professionals have been quite frank about Penny Mellor. The General Medical Council psychiatrists are also rather interesting. Their forensic psychiatrist is particularly interested in the antics of Penny Mellor. We know that because we have colleagues at the Royal College of Psychiatrists. The copy of her Forensic Psychiatric Report matches with the above remarks by her. The Forensic Psychiatrist who assessed her is also interesting. A copy of this report was present in the files and accessed by the right people.

Promiscuity, irrational ideation, running commentaries, obsessional fixations on various two doctors. We find her fixation on David Southall almost fascinating. We postulate that the origins was a sexual attraction, but Mellor has to feed her addiction while holding onto David Southall, by imagining herself talking to him. This is what it appears to be in her various posts and also the msbp website. In reality of course David Southall does not give Penny Mellor the time of day. Penny Mellor cannot accept this or does not seem to anyway. Penny Mellor thinks herself invinsible. Even invinsible to the forensic psychiatrists. Now that is even more interesting.

We find the word " failure" rather interesting because she is reflecting her own insecurities on Dr Pal now. She writes what she would consider a product of her insecurities. Mellor deflects attention from herself by writing about her particular obsession. Mellor is currently practising transference.

Mellor is currently oddly preoccupied that Dr Pal is somehow after her. She is also preoccupied that David Southall is reading her blog. She was preoccupied that a number of people were "after her in the past". Of course, no one is after her at all. This is simply yet another fixation she has much like the rest of her fixed beliefs. The beliefs seem to be unshakable. The style of her writing seems to be disjointed in some ways, mixed with capitals in odd places. The syntax is unstructured making her emotionally unstable at this present time. The good thing about Doctors.net.uk is that everyone is anonymous and there are psychiatrists on there who take an interest in the subject of personality disorders. The interest is of course academic. We believe that Doctors.net.uk has members who work in Wolverhampton. We are of course pleased about that. One of these days there may well be a thread on Penny Mellor discussing the various aspects of her persona.

We have always found that Penny Mellor has failed in everything in her life specifically her educational achievements. Actually, she has no educational achievements. Her personality is such that she compensates by obtaining praise from lawyers, victims etc. By degrading others, she captures the limelight for herself. Victims are a good source of praise that is required. Victims are often grateful for anything and superbly vulnerable.

Please note the current unstable reaction to our innocent post on personality disorders. I believe we are due to write a researched piece on prostitution. Then we will hopefully write a piece on drug addiction and personality disorders.

Disgusting Behaviour by those with a Personality Disorder

The main issue about people with personality disorders is their complete lack of insight. They are often manipulative, have criminal minds and lie constantly. Personality disordered patients normally have a past history of trauma such as sexual abuse or domestic violence. There are many types of personality disorders described in psychiatric literature. They often develop fixations on people. They often have running commentaries and develop delusions that the person they fantasise over pays attention to them. This is termed the "Fatal Attraction effect". A personality disorder can be described by Wikipaedia and is an interesting read.

The other issue about those with personality disorders depending on the type is that they are unable to fit logical sequences together. They often fit 1 + 4 = 11. We also postulate that some scientologists may have developed these personality disorders due to the cult's pressure on the mind.

We are all agreed with Charles Pragnell whose deleted words are self explanatory. Mixed and Other Personality Disorders are classified by the WHO. We are also sure that Lisa Blakemore Brown would agree with this analysis.

F60.8		Other specific personality disorders
		Personality (disorder): · eccentric · "haltlose" type · immature · narcissistic · passive-aggressive · psychoneurotic
F60.9		Personality disorder, unspecified
		Character neurosis NOS Pathological personality NOS

A combination of querulousness and fixed ideation is rather interesting. No matter how much this person is told they are wrong, they still assume they are right. Dangerous eccentrics often fall into these categories. Personality disordered often have absolutely no insight in their pathological activities. Their manipulative nature and promiscuity is often self evident. The narcissist is thought to lack proper (external) ego functioning. Narcissistic personality disorder and its derivatives can be caused by excessive praise and criticism in childhood, particularly that from parental figures. Narcissistic personality disorder is frequently mistaken for self-centeredness.

"A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following^[1]:

1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes that he or she is "special" and unique
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement
6. is interpersonally exploitative
7. lacks empathy
8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

The hypothetical causes are as follows [ Source Wikipaedia]

Hypothetical causes

The etiology of this disorder is unknown according to Groopman and Cooper. However, they list the following factors identified by various researchers as possible factors.^[2]

• An oversensitive temperament at birth
• Overindulgence and overvaluation by parents
• Valued by parents as a means to regulate their own self-esteem
• Excessive admiration that is never balanced with realistic feedback
• Unpredictable or unreliable caregiving from parents
• Severe emotional abuse in childhood
• Being praised for perceived exceptional looks or talents by adults
• "Constant praise for good behaviors, and criticism for poor behaviors in childhood"

Some narcissistic traits are common and a normal developmental phase. When these traits are compounded by a failure of the interpersonal environment and continue into adulthood they may intensify to the point where NPD is diagnosed.^{[citation needed]} It has been suggested^[who?] that NPD may be exacerbated by the onset of aging and the physical, mental, and occupational restrictions it imposes as can most personality traits.^{[3][dubious – discus .}

"People who are overly narcissistic commonly feel rejected, humiliated and threatened when criticised. To protect themselves from these dangers, they often react with disdain, rage, and/or defiance to any slight criticism, real or imagined ^[7]. To avoid such situations, some narcissistic people withdraw socially and may feign modesty or humility"

"Typically, as narcissism is an ingrained personality trait, rather than a chemical imbalance, medication and therapy are not very effective in treating the disorder. Schema Therapy, a form of therapy developed by Jeffrey E. Young that integrates several therapeutic approaches (psychodynamic, cognitive, behavioral etc.), also offers an approach for the treatment of NPD. ^[12]

It is unusual for people to seek therapy for NPD. Subconscious fears of exposure or inadequacy are often met with defensive disdain of therapeutic processes ^[13], ^[14]

Pharmacotherapy is rarely used. In a review of the literature, one patient responded to Wellbutrin.[1]"

This trait is not recognised by the General Medical Council, the police or various authorities who are often taken in by the manipulative nature. We urge the psychiatrists present at the General Medical Council health panel to review the issues listed here. Forensic Psychiatry is always rather interesting especially when we have a report to go by.

A self help website states as follows

"When you are dealing with Pathological Narcissism, you are dealing with a mental disorder that causes the afflicted person to feel that they are the most important person. However, it can go much farther than that, because people with severe Pathological Narcissism might get to the point where they believe that they are actually the only real, true people in the world"

This is another interesting website. There is a quote that is particularly appropriate.

""I didn't know another human being could be so cruel, manipulative, deceptive and twist reality so much and just walk away like nothing ever happened. It has left me questioning myself, who I am as a person, fundamental laws of reality and life itself."

The BBC article

Dr David Holmes, a psychiatrist at Manchester Metropolitan University, told BBC News a sufferer would be "very selfish". They would also have "a sense of entitlement, in that they expect praise and things to be given to them as it were, and to be treated almost as royalty, most of the time, by most people".

Most sufferers do not recognise their problem. They continue to deny the issue. Their manipulative nature is used to engulf others who are vulnerable. In turn the vulnerable provides the sufferer with the much needed attention and praise that they crave. The General Medical Council itself told a number of people that forensic psychiatrists often make assessments on personality disorders through the person's writing. As long as the doctor states that this is all he used, this is the sort of expert opinion that is useful. Particular attention is paid to written material on websites, documentation, format of complaints, methodology of harassment to various people, manipulation of the truth etc. Prior history in the criminal courts is also persuasive. A broad range of documentation is often used and assessed. If these people are becoming a nuisance to others and if sufficient people complaint, it does become a matter for the mental health team. The Mental Health Act is only used for those who become troublesome in society due to their mental health problems or even personality disorders.

Better the Devlin You know - Introducing Andrew P King, Lodger to Penny Mellor

Officers and directors

Anthony F. Martin	Chairman
Prof James P. Burnie	CEO
Andrew P. King	Director, Finance and Secretary

NeuTec Pharma Ltd.

Summary NeuTec wants to make visiting the hospital an experience that lessens patient dangers. The biopharmaceutical company identifies and compares antibodies produced by patients who recover from infections (acquired in hospitals) to those produced by patients who die. Then, using its FabTec technology, it develops genetically recombinant antibodies, or "grabs," to treat patients with life-threatening infections. The company's two leading candidates, Mycograb, which targets a fungus in the mouth and skin, and Aurograb, which targets bacterial infections, are in clinical trials in the UK. Mycograb also is in clinical trials in the US. More from Hoovers » 2nd Fl., Clinical Sciences Building, Central Manchester Healthcare Trust, Oxford Rd. Manchester, M13 9WL GBR +44-161-276-8827 (Phone) +44-161-276-8826 (Fax) Company website: http://www.neutecpharma.com Related Companies Name Name Exchange Symbol Last Trade Change Mkt Cap Piramed Limited Piramed Limited Takeda Cambridge Ltd. Takeda Cambridge Ltd. IC-VEC Ltd IC-VEC Ltd Trigen Holdings AG Trigen Holdings AG Babraham Bioscience Technologies Limited Babraham Bioscience Technologies Limited Oxagen Limited Oxagen Limited Hunter-Fleming Ltd Hunter-Fleming Ltd Lectus Therapeutics Ltd. Lectus Therapeutics Ltd. Argenta Discovery Ltd. Argenta Discovery Ltd. Huntingdon Life Sciences Limited Huntingdon Life Sciences Limited

Officers and directors Anthony F. Martin Chairman Prof James P. Burnie CEO Andrew P. King Director, Finance and Secretary Discussions Start a discussion about NeuTec Pharma Ltd. »

VOGON POETRY - In the style of Andrew P King's Fishwife

She is at it again :)!

This is generated by the Vogon BBC Poetry Generator

Here goes

See, see the Old bat sky
Marvel at its big Pink depths.
Tell me, Penny Mellor do you
Wonder why the Morgan ignores you?
Why its foobly stare
makes you feel Drunk .
I can tell you, it is
Worried by your msbp facial growth
That looks like
A Brian.
What's more, it knows
Your Brian Morgan potting shed
Smells of Brian Morgan.
Everything under the big Old bat sky
Asks why, why do you even bother?
You only charm Penny Mellors.

An Example of Confusion by the Mellor Camp

The audience should understand that Mellor was the source of Hemming's information. Mellor's addled brain often merges protocols as she cannot tell which one went through and which ones didn't. We can only assume Morgan was involved. Both lack substantial medical knowledge. Both misinterprete information given to them and they both supplied documents to Hemming who was also misled. Mellor places up a number of documents from the past. These have all been tried and tested through various local investigations and even national investigations. These investigations have never been upheld locally. Mellor though wishes to try to replay the same issues within the GMC. Mellor is now practising ground hog day - where allegations that have been thrown out are replayed within her website much like a broken record. Of course, this is what Morgan and Mellor does - minimises the information online thereby misleading the public.
With great accusations comes great expectations. Of course, it is a shame the public are unaware that Mellor, Morgan and Hemming just make it up as they go along.

By way of example, we use the following protocol :-

26th January 2007. Great Accusations.Times Higher Jonathan Gornall.

"Hemmings Pre Christmas Speech was 1800 word " best of" compilation of many accusations against Southall that have been posted over years on MAMA website. He began by conflating two entirely differents studies"

" Perhaps the biggest project was known as Protocol 85.02" Hemming said, apparently unaware that according to Southall the study known as 85.02, although ethically approved had never taken place. " Southall looked at the response of babies to asphyxiation, shortage of oxygen and the presence of carbon monoxide. The experiments were known as sleep studies with about 7000 babies born in the mid 1980s at Doncaster and Rotherham Hospitals.

Protocol 85.02 and the study of 7000 babies to which Hemming referred were not one in the same thing. Protocol 85.02 had been preceeded by a multicentred prospective study into SIDs funded by the British Heart Foundation for the Study of Infant Death"

The Trouble With Brian Morgan

The trouble with Brian Morgan is that he is of the view that he can investigate. In truth, he is a rather an unfortunate journalist who has never had anything of note published of late. Mellor this morning cites " Brian Morgan, investigative journalist unravelling the truth". The document on her website again is a selective cherry picked document that means nothing. The matter relating to Southall et al and the poor attention to detail means Morgan has got his data all mixed up. That is of course the trouble. The problem with Morgan is that he believes that material in the public domain and the media makes it all the truth. The other day we found a piece written in the Times Higher by Jonathan Gornall. That was rather an interesting analysis of events showing how wrong Morgan is and perhaps how wrong Mellor has been. For all those who know the Times Higher well, Gornall's piece is in a copy in any Library. Please email us for the reference.

Morgan has been obsessing over these issues since about 1990. He has dedicated his life to it but his theories have never had any doctors struck off. Morgan though persists in his theories probably due to the past of Mo Wilson. Morgan though is no scientist and despite his contacts with the vast array of media professionals, he was shown up last night as nothing more than a cyberstalker and harasser.

We should point out again that these comments were made by Mo Wilson's partner. Mo Wilson being a National Union of Journalist member.

Having sent the messages to Dr Pal, he has the temerity to call himself a " investigative journalist". We say he is nothing but a creep but then we can say that. Morgan was so threatened by the material Dr Pal published on her previous blog that they sought to complain and threaten her. But then this is the sort of behaviour that has propagated across the board. Morgan attempted to infiltrate Child Health Advocacy International. Morgan's name was on the consent court document of the stolen documents. This is not to mention the various destructive efforts against various people.

Morgan and Mellor believe that distributing fragments of documents is persuasive in anyway. It is a bit like the documents obtained from CAI. It is all very well and good getting the documents but assessing what they mean is a different kettle of fish. We should also make the point that journalists are normally independent people. They have no vested interests in the group they are writing about. Everything Morgan has written about msbp/Southall etc should be listed with his conflict of interest - ie his involvement with Mellor and the anti msbp.com campaign. Morgan talks about the Code of Conduct of doctors. Of course, Morgan has never declared his conflicts of interests in any of his pieces. We have no idea whether he has explained his liasion with Mellor's campaigning group to the editors who have published his material in good faith. The writer himself has a vested interest in the material he has written. Of course, no one would question this one iota because he is a journalist and journalists have no accountability. They can happily harass all and sundry and he certainly does.

We should therefore take a look at the Code of Conduct of Journalists. [See below]

So come on Brian Morgan. Lets see what you are made of. Lets see whether the National Union of Journalists supports your distorted work bandied around in various newspapers. Lets see if the National Union of Journalists backs you 100 percent. In 14 days, we expect the statement of support to be on Penny Mellor's website. If it is not there, we can only assume that they don't support you one bit.

Appendix A - Code of conduct

Members of the National Union of Journalists are expected to abide by the following professional principles:
A journalist:
1. At all times upholds and defends the principle of media freedom, the right of freedom of expression and the right of the public to be informed.
2. Strives to ensure that information disseminated is honestly conveyed, accurate and fair.
3. Does her/his utmost to correct harmful inaccuracies.
4. Differentiates between fact and opinion;
5. Obtains material by honest, straightforward and open means, with the exception of investigations that are both overwhelmingly in the public interest and which involve evidence that cannot be obtained by straightforward means.
6. Does nothing to intrude into anybody’s private life, grief or distress unless justified by overriding consideration of the public interest.
7. Protects the identity of sources who supply information in confidence and material gathered in the course of her/his work.
8. Resists, threats or any other inducements to influence, distort or suppress information, and takes no unfair personal advantage of information gained in the course of her/his duties before the information is public knowledge.
9. Produces no material likely to lead to hatred or discrimination on the grounds of a person’s age, gender, race, colour, creed, legal status, disability, marital status, or sexual orientation.
10. Does not by way of statement, voice or appearance endorse by advertisement any commercial product or service save for the promotion of her/his own work or of the medium by which she/he is employed.
11. Avoids plagiarism.

Desperate Times :)

Things are getting desperate at Mellor Towers. Now she coughs up a old letter that was originally on mumsnet. The letter was from Chris Mullane of South Wales Police requesting information from the families that were represented by none other than Bill Bache. Of course, we know Bill has a duty of care to personal data. Bill leaks information to Mellor or the families do and Mellor publishes it. It is all very simple. What Bache cannot do within the Law Society Guidance, Mellor does.

Thats all well and good of course until you examine their motive. Bill Bache is after compensation for his clients. They will of course do anything to gain some publicity. Now, the most amusing thing about Chris is that he actually dislikes both Mellor and Bill Bache. The other more interesting fact is that Mellor often thinks that by instigating investigations, she can remind the GMC that they can all cast aspersions on the conduct of David Southall. Of course, nothing has come of the investigation. We know the cases in South Wales.

There is no decision to proceed to the CPS and no ruling by said CPS. For this Mellor should be arrested for wasting police time and public money. The letter was written many years ago and there is still no outcome. Its all well and good crowing about investigations but its the outcome that counts. So far there is no criminal sanction against David Southall now matter what speculative theories Mellor wishes to raise.

Now, where were we on Penny Mellor's Psychiatric Report. Ah yes, the past history section. Very very interesting! We shall now go back to reading it. Ta Ta!

SHE IS THICK

Well, we win and one person lost. Penny Mellor is trully dim. Good, glad we established that fact. Now we can move on.

This is what she says though "it is this, this blog was not set up to inform the public, this blog was set up specifically to let Southall know that I know, he and his cohorts will know from the "odd" document exactly what I now have by way of evidence and I know David reads my blog!"

Best larrrrf we have had.

Change the JPEG Mellor

We spotted an interesting assessment by NHS Exposed Blog yesterday this morning. It made sense but we really don't think the Wicked Conspirator is about to stop snapping. The David Southall Exposed site goes from bad to worse these days. It all started with that awful picture of hers on the side. It certainly looks like the wicked conspirator is still in her own prison. As pictures go, we preferred the red haired version in front of the GMC's mannequin. No doubt Mellor was inspecting the butt of said mannequin.


We all admit to have criticised the Wicked Conspirator to the hilt. No doubt the Wicked Conspirator feels the same way. She refers to us affectionately as the " toilet blog" and shortens her own name to WC. Can we request a change of picture from the severe witch to the playful one. Can we also request a revamp of her website so we can see if Mellor can cut it in the big bad world of blogging. We currently have fantastic bets on whether Mellor will listen to the arguments mooted on NHS Exposed blog. Only one person has voted for her, the rest against her. In our view, NHS Exposed Blog is stupid to assume that there is a logical bone in Penny Mellor's body.

Nevertheless, we await the Wicked Conspirator's response. Could she also confirm whether its true that Judge Whitburn accused her of being funded by the IRA and also having malicious intent in destroying David Southall and Roy Meadow? In fact, could she confirm what went on in the hearing for us. On the 29th August 2006 she told msbp.com

"Ah that would be the same judge that also stated I was probably funded by the IRA and that "Professors Southall and Meadow are the most eminent of paediatricians members of the jury and this woman has done nothing more than try to destroy their careers out of sheer malice" (thanks for that Guy Whitburn at least that's on record). Yes, I think I'll take what Whitburn said about me with a pinch of salt sweetie. Anyway the Pankhursts were called dangerous eccentrics too-so I am in good company! Woof"

Well, its another day in the world of the Wicked Conspirator filled with lawyers, FOI requests and plotting.

Running Commentary

Penny Mellor is up bright and early this morning. She seems to be conducting discussions with David Southall again. This amused us on the msbp.com, Mellor sits and talks to David as if he were there listening to her. Her latest post describes her Freedom of Information Act requests hobby. Little does she know that hospitals often do not disclose data. Mellor though is happily in her old little world talking to someone who isn't reading her blog and who isn't next to her. She is conducting a running commentary. Perhaps she has a poster sized picture of David Southall whom she speaks to every night.

Debbie Henshall has lied, that is why she was called a liar. Penny Mellor admitted to lying, that is why she is called a liar.

Minimalist Approaches

Life hasn't been easy for Penny Mellor. Most of her associates seem to be betraying her by leaving messages within this blog. In the meantime, Mellor is of the view that if she continues placing minimalist documents on the internet about David Southall, we will believe her. Of course, the documents are simply one side of the entire picture. Where Mellor is concerned, she likes to make things up. No one has to believe us, you just have to read her own website. From Rat Science to interpretation of protocols. Ummmm. On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 12:04:15 EDT she said in an email.

"I'm brilliant at finding things on the internet but the rest well might as well be greek to me!"

Penny

Mellor herself admits she does not understand a lot of the documentation sent to her. Exactly what is she trying to expose in the case of David Southall. Then of course there is Miss M's full report at North Staffordshire NHS Trust. Of course, we must not forget that linking to this report that remains on the internet will be done soon enough. Going through Mellor's website, one can spot that her English Language is not up to scratch and her spelling mistakes are phenomenal. We are suprised any journalist listens to her.

For the journalists who have left messages on this board. Unfortunately, we are unable to reply to every email but we are happy to supply documentation we have.

Charles Pragnell. A Respected Professional Comments on Penny Mellor

"In her mxxxxxxxs, Mellor is projecting her own personality onto others. She has been accused on many, many times on the MAMA Board of bullying, intimidating, harassing, threatening, and abusing many others in a vicious and vindictive manner. Her defence is to project that back onto others. Mxd people in their twisted reasoning believe they are the perfect being and everyone else should be like them – this is Mellor. So any criticism of her she just reflects back onto others in order to deny her own badness/mxdnxss. Similarly when she is complimented by her sycophants she modestly declines their compliments (whilst at the same time preening and glowing in their praises) and then reflects their compliments back onto them. In this way she is a very clever and accomplished manipulator"

ABOUT PENNY MELLOR - Statement by Psychologist Lisa Blakemore Brown

I first became aware of Penny Mellor in the summer of 1998. The year before I had been part of a New Zealand documentary expressing great concern about the use of the term Munchausen by Proxy and the behaviour and powerful influence of Professor David Southall. I was an Expert in a Court case with Professor Southall and felt that a great miscarriage of justice had occurred when the Judge found in favour of his MSBP opinion and four children were removed from a family.

Oddly, I had no idea where Ms Mellor actually came from, but she suddenly appeared linked to a website www.msbp.com

She seemed to have considerable influence for a woman professing to be just a housewife with considerable young children to raise.

She never contacted me even though I had been one of the very few professionals speaking out at that time, with apparently the same concerns that she had.

Her early involvement with one Sharon Payne was obvious when I arrived at Mrs Payne's house to meet her and go through paperwork as I had been instructed to undertake a report. Suddenly, as I was speaking with Ms Payne at a table in her house, a woman unknown to me appeared at my side, haviong either just let herself in or having been there all the time but not making herself known. She seemed to have a problem looking me straight in the eye. Ms Payne introduced her as 'Penny Mellor'.

The next time I met Ms Mellor was at the Griffiths Inquiry. Astonishingly, Ms Mellor seemed to have been able to arrange an 'inquiry' into David Southall's research. However, I was not asked to give evidence and was not even told about it directly.

I therefore made it my business to find out about it. After being thrown a few red herrings, inexplicably, by both Ms Mellor and Mr Morgan I called around and found out the details. I then contacted the Griffiths Panel and said that I had been very involved in trying to expose what I felt were gross miscarriages of justice, in particular in the 1995 case, had written many letters to Government officials and Ministers, written published articles, flown to the other side of the world despite being in the middle of Grade 3 breast cancer treatment to support a family and advise the social workers in New Zealand from my perspective. Yet it seemed I was being airbrushed out now that Penny Mellor had arrived, and I could not understand this as I had a great deal of information to offer.

The Panel asked me to give evidence to that Inquiry, which I did.

Ms Mellor was at the Inquiry and we had a short conversation over a drink.

Some months later, in late 1999, I was informed by Penny Mellor and Sharon Payne that the latter had terminal ovarian cancer.

It was this that led me to allow her to come to my home in January 2000 to stay there for a break when I went to New Zealand again. I was still recovering from the shock of my own cancer and was still having treatment. The thought of this poor woman dying from cancer and leaving her 3 children after all she had gone through with the MSBP allegation was deeply distressing. I thought she would be helped by this act of kindness.

Sadly, Ms Payne had another agenda and Ms Mellor was part of it. Not only had my home been rifled through, material had been taken specific to what I gave to the Griffiths Inquiry and many other personal and financial documents were stolen.

A Charity had given money to Sharon Payne thinking she had cancer and the person running the Charity told me Sharon would call her from my home, still on the phone in the early hours, laughing when told she shouldn't run up my bill. This same person was told that she had copied 200 documents and also that she was intending leaving the house before we got back. The Charity person knew that the key purpose - aprt from a rest for Sharon - of being at my house was to look after a very old Collie. She told Sharon she couldn't leave the dog. Distressed by this, the Charity person called the Police and told them an old dog was going to be left alone. I don't know what happened because she was still there on my return. She left on a Saturday after I arranged and paid for a taxi to the station.

On the following Monday she was due to attend hospital for a serious life saving operation for the cancer. However, no-one could find her and this was being discussed on the MAMA board.

At the end of the day, a colleague of mine in Liverpool who used to refer children to me for assessment called. She asked me to sit down. She told me that Sharon had been at her Centre all day with her 3 children. I said 'Ah so thats where she's been is it.'

She went on to say that she could only describe what she had done and said as an attempt to 'completely destroy my livelihood and my reputation'. Her main aim to was stop her referring any more children to me.

The next day I had a call from a female journalist who I had met as she had an interest in the MSBP stories. She seemed shocked on the phone and asked if I was going to London. I was at a Tribunal later that week and we met. She was ashen. She told me that 'Penny Mellor and Sharon Payne have been calling all the Press' and by this journalist's account doing what Sharon did to my colleague in Liverpool.

From then on matters deteriorated. I now know that Penny Mellor has been telling parents for years many lies about me in order to prevent them from making contact with me. She makes claims that I have ruined cases, that it was me who conspired to abduct the child in the case she went to prison over, that I breach confidentiality, that I have sent her daily abusive emails, when I can count on two hands in the nine years since she descended the number of emails I have ever sent to her.

People linked to the Liverpool Centre and Sharon Payne were involved in a vexatious complaint to the BPS in 2001 just as I was trying to complete my book. It seemed a clear effort to stop me writing it. I carried on.

The case came to a Hearing in August 2002 just weeks after the Department of Health MSBP Guidelines were set in stone, and following a consultation period when I put together a lengthy paragraph by paragraph critique of the Guidelines. I received a shirty letter from Jacqui Smith, then Minister for Health telling me cynically that I could be certain that my views had been noted.

I began to be suspicious that Penny Mellor was somehow involved with the Government and/or the pharmaceutical industry, because of the way in which she and these other bodies all acted in the same manner re what I was aying and MSBP. Why would Penny Mellor want to discredit and ruin me if I was saying what she was saying? Parents have since told me that she has had a specific way of operating.

As soon as the MAMA board was set up, she would put her telephone number at the bottom of every post. She bombarded the site with her posts. Gradually she was able to draw to her those families who had been falsely accused. She would then tell them lies about me to prevent them making contact or continuing contact and would also promise them 'deals' with the media, plus a lawyer - Bill Bache.

Using perceived links to high profile cases, many Family Court cases were drawn in and I certainly knew that she was damaging my reputation by lies. At least two families have informed me that far from helping them, she has kept them on hold for years using their fear and her promises.

The libel came to a head in 2004 when Fiona Woollard, having drawn information out of me about Sharon Payne (a friend of hers) then tampered with it and sent it to Penny Mellor. She in turn sent it to the British Psychological Society who, after losing their case against me in 2002, were hanging onto another vexatious complaint from 2003 without testing it through a Conduct Hearing, knowing it would fall given what I had told them. Instead, they were rushing through their Fitness to Practise procedures to say I was mentally ill.

When Penny Mellor sent all the Fiona Woollard emails to the BPS in one go - as Wooollard had done - they leapt on them. They reported to each other 'We have another complaint'. It was perfect timing. Perhaps too perfect. Penny Mellor was telling them exactly what they wanted to hear - that I was 'not fit to practise'. She had by then been involved heavily with the GMC and bragged openly that she had got a lot of Psychs struck off.

The BPS brought in a Psychiatrist one week and asked if he would advise their Panel the following. He had never ever met me, and had no time to even read the cobbled together bundle in the time available to him.

Yet he went ahead and gave them what they wanted - that he thought I was paranoid. He called Penny Mellor a 'professional' and said I should not call her barking mad - I didn't, Fiona Wollard did. The BPS then rushed to start their very first Fitness to Practise case before he had even written what turned out to be an appalling and factually inaccurate report.

I had established that the BPS and the GMC used Field Fisher Waterhouse as advisers and from 2003 on their website they referred to 'confidential Government projects'. That has now been removed but caould be found again.

The unrelenting libel from Mellor continued behind the scenes and on the MAMA board through inference and coded messages - ie using L B B etc, 'the professional', 'the author 'etc.

In 2005 Penny Mellor sent another email to the BPS. This time she cynically tried to claim that she had no intention of stopping me working with autistic children, but that she thought I was ill and needed help. She claimed that I had sent abusive emails to her every day for 18 months - yet she couldn't provide one of them. She said they were too bad to send...

It is interesting that just 12 months earlier she never mentioned what would have been the 6 months of daily abusive emails.

Perhaps this is why the BPS did not include this email in the bundle. Instead I found it from a DPA request and included it.

Looking back and standing back, I think Penny Mellor was brought in as a distraction, with the job of seeming to be after David Southall, but knowing nothing would ever happen as is he so well protected. Infiltrating the MSBP group helped her pull families in so she cxould make sure she knew everything about them and their cases went nowhere. Direct attacks on me would ensure these families would not get further with my help or indeed that my help would be worth having by the time they had finished with the libel and slander.

I fully believe there is a Dept of Health/GMC/BPS connection with Penny Mellor.


Lisa Blakemore-Brown

The Detectives

Brian Morgan and Penny Mellor as The Detectives

Penny Mellor's detective consists of Brian Morgan who is more Inspector Cluso. They both actually remind us of the comedy show The Detectives. We had to fall off our chairs at Mellor's latest diatribe. Money can indeed buy private detectives as we know. It is a shame Mellor's money couldn't buy a decent one.

Today we thought we would entertain the world by a excerpt from MAMA msbp.com. Here is the post. It is self explanatory.

"She says on here partner worked his way up in food chain from the bottom, however in a book written by John Batt he is in Fortune 500. Does not quite tie in with information given to us by her.

Book by John Batt on Sally Clark. Second Edition 2005. Page 370 March 2001

Penny Mellor is the daughter of a major in military intelligence. She narrowly missed being blown up, twice, by IRA bombs, and her partner is a Fortune 500 company director. Penny has eight children. A fearless woman, she has boundless energy, high intelligenc, a photographic memory and a certainty that many mothers have been wrongly accused of child murder or abuse. A grapevine of such mothers has turned into a formidable array of victims, calling on her for help to find lawyers and experts to help them fight false accusations. I soon conclude that she is a saint, but one in a unholy amount of trouble herself.

Mostly she helps people by phone. One such mother was falsely accused of murdering a baby and Social Services were about to take a five year old sibling into care. The grandmother, fearful of what might happen to her grandchild in care, spirited her away - a serious offence. The parents followed them to Ireland. When they eventually returned to England, they were arrested and charged with the kidnap of the child. On the basis of a number of phone calls to the family, none lasting more than 40 seconds, Penny too was arrested and charged with conspiracy.

The others are persuaded to plead guilty in the hope that they will receive non-custodial sentences. Penny fights the case because she has done nothing criminal or wrong, and had no hand at all in the kidnap. Convinced that the mother was originally the victim of false allegations, she argues her case like the tiger she is, and antagonises the judge. The jury convicts her and the judge hands her a savage two year sentence. The others are also sent to prison. Penny's sentence is reduced to eighteen months on appeal, of which she serves half.

Penny is thought of by many as a martyr to the cause of the victims of false allegations of abuse and murder. As a lawyer I can see that orders of the court must be upheld and those that flout them must be punished. But the problem stems from flawed evidence given by experts which is believed by the judges becaue of the expertts impressive qualifications and, maybe, eminence in the profession. The judges of the Family Division get to know them well and rely on them. If some of the experts have theories with weak justification, it may be difficult for judges to spot this unless other experts challenge them. It is said that some judges are simply not interested in scientific research. The secrecy ensures not only the anonymity of the children, but that all other details of the case are kept secret. Any shortcomings of those experts will remain hidden. Justice denied in secrecy is a cancer which, if not dealt with, will spread. The imprisonment of Penny and the others in that case illustrates the collateral damage caused if ordinary people are denied justice in the most emotionally charged area of their lives - their children. Prevented from drawing public attention to their injustice, they may take the law into their own hands and cause even more problems for the system.

Penny, released from prison after 9 months, becomes one of my most valuable sources of information in helping Sally"

Penny Mellor Tells John Hemming to " Come, Sit, Stay and Play"

Penny Mellor's Control Over John Hemming MP.
Trained Well 10/10
Deserves a Favour

Long ago on a website far away Penny Mellor was questioned about her exclusive rights on John Hemming MP. Apart from their relationship that resulted in the failed Hansard debate on David Southall, they both did a number of other things.

Here is Mellor asking the world of vulnerable mothers only to send documents to John Hemming MP as a result of her contact with Beverley Hughes MP. Beverley Hughes MP allegedly did a number of favours for Penny Mellor including arranging a change in prison. Penny Mellor the ex jail bird wanted to be near her family. Having failed to flaunt her pregnancy as a reason for not being sent to prison, Whitburn locked her up for a number of months. Beverley Hughes MP also received a 104 page report regarding msbp.

Penny Mellor on 17th August 2006 [msbp.com]

John Hemming is one of those MPs. I strongly advise that you send him any document -- and nobody else; with the caveat that they are for his eyes only"

A debate then continued and she was challenged as to why John Hemming MP should have exclusive rights. Mellor had no response. Mellor and Hemming both slept in solidarity on the msbp.com board.

On the 29th August 2006, a poster wrote the following

"I would urge extreme caution when sending ANY correspondence to John Hemming MP. He advised me that the contents of a letter I had sent to his office marked as private and confidential had "thereby become public" and I received unsolicited and unwanted contact from a third party, who had read the contents of a highly confidential email I subsequently sent him"

Mr Hemming essentially responding telling the entire world what the first name of the poster was thereby breaching the poster's Data Protection Act 1998

"very helpful Edward as usual. I would confirm to people that my post is opened by my staff. If people only want me to read things they must write on those things "for his eyes only". Then the envelope is not opened. Probably a third of the letters I receive are "private and confidential". Those are opened by my staff and frequently dealt with by my staff.

Essentially, anyone writing to John Hemming can expect everyone to see the documents, they can also expect him to disclose the letter writers first name.

29th August 2006 Hemming admits as follows

"The second is that my wife reads my emails. That was true, but given that I am receiving information covered by the contempt of court legislation (see the 2005 Statutory Instrument) there is additional security on my computer and my wife does not read my emails. She has not read my emails for at least 3 months"

In this era of data security breaches by the government, we can see that the Liberal Democrat Party are no better. Basically, any vulnerable parent sending their data to Mr John Hemming and Penny Mellor can expect it to be bandied about everywhere. In Mr Hemming's case, we can expect everything sent to be read by his wife, his children, his dog and his goldfish. After that, nothing prevents his kids from circulating it further. Someone ought to read the Data Protection Act about data security as related to Members of Parliament. In Penny Mellor's case anyone sending data to her can expect it to be used everywhere on the internet.

We note Paul Heathcote has made his way from is usual playground and has lent his hand to Penny Mellor.

We all laughed outloud when they pointed to a judgment where a Dr Adoko was declared a vexatious litigant. The judgment reminded us of behaviour by Penny Mellor. We have mooted the idea of Querulous By Proxy - ie she instigates others into making complaints. In her case, she instigates others to run to various lawyers who take their legal aid away leaving them to flounder. Mellor is what we call a " dim" user of people. Mellor though has made her collection of "breach of confidentiality" complaints that have gone no where. She has tapped into a lucrative resource ie vulnerable mothers and she mints whatever she mints out of them. Of course, she thinks we don't know what she mints but we do have a fairly clear idea thanks to Bill Bache's staff members.

Can Mr Hemming confirm what is Penny Mellor's Fridge? Do you store your data in Penny Mellor's Fridge for safe keeping? As women go, we understand Hemming insists on turning up the heat in all Fridges but we wonder what the temperature was when Mellor entered Yardley. Is there more data that leaks out of John Hemming office? Perhaps we should separate this into organic molecules and inorganic molecules.

We spotted this in our local paper.

"HEALTH experts say ever younger men are increasingly turning to Viagra in a bid to keep up with modern women inspired by strong female characters in films such as Sex And The City".

We wonder if the Liberal Democrats are finding a problem with raising their profile. John Hemming MP though knows how to solve these problems with uplift. If he has problems, he can always ask Penny Mellor to raise his profile.

Penny Mellor's Fridge

What Lies in Penny Mellor's Fridge

As the temperature deteriorates at the Mellor camp, we note that her obsession with Dr Pal continues. This might be another delusional obsession Mellor has developed much like her fixation on David Southall. We must thank all those who have messaged us through this blog and told us about some interesting details concerning Mellor's past especially her previous partners. As for Stuart Carnie's wife, we aren't interested in what she has to say. She is probably a dysfunctional woman with a tendency to play the "victim" card. It would be a bit of a similar situation to all the men that left Mellor. Mind you, you can understand why any man in their normal mind would leave Mellor.

As the audience will understand we have a number of tales to follow - 1001 Arabian Nights, Penny Mellor's ability to understand home economics and home equipment and now we consider the tales of the Fridge. In our view, she has to understand something given her low intellect. Monica Lewinsky once had a lot more in her fridge than milk. Penny Mellor may have a lot more in her fridge as well. Our question really centres around the contents of her Fridge and whether she does go shopping for her family. Mellor points out that we have no evidence. What she doesn't point out though that we do have the evidence in large quantities. In fact that is why this blog still continues. It is simply this, we like our traffic, we like to feature information day by day and very slowly. For instance, we would not want the story about the Catholic School or the abuse suffered in the past to all be presented in one go. These things must be done slowly.

We assume Penny Mellor agrees that Stuart Carnie was never the issuer of the death threat against Southall. She has currently not denied that she opted to frame Mr Carnie. Well, we know that Stuart is not the most perfect man in the universe but there is two sides to one story. What is more interesting is the identity of the person issued the death threat. It is a bit like tampering with Lisa Blakemore Brown's emails isn't it Mellor? Let us therefore have the full story about your dealings with Stuart Carnie. We can then have the audience compare it to Carnie's side of the story. It seems that Carnie apparently has no free speech in this issue does he. Like every catfight, you have now brought out the wife and child card against him. Isn't that what all you women do to men in the family courts. What rights do men have in the family courts by the way? None.

Before we go, here is an interesting insight from Unity In Justice

"Penny is not in any way in control of any aspect of our group. This group remains under the sole reserved control of myself and Von Coulter with additional assistance from someone at the BBC. I am mindful of the affair involving Brian Morgan, Stuart Carnie and Penny Mellor involving the child abduction and have always avoided her attentions up til now."
Ian Watson

The Thieving Ways of ......................

People are often of the view that the end justifies the means. It doesn't of course. Sharon Payne was nothing but a low life who sought to pull the wool over Child Advocacy International with the view to stealing documents. Now Child Advocacy International is in the business of assisting the third world with help that is essential. Why would anyone stoop low enough to compromise their work [ no matter what they thought of David Southall]. The documents were stolen and there was a photocopying party. Sharon Payne has a best friend called Heather Collins. More on Heather Collins later. Heather Collins is married to a Mr Collins. This is Heather Collins, best friend of Sharon Payne. Payne was found guilty of contempt of court. Brian Morgan having got his paws on documents signed a consent order to prevent any court sanction.

Penny On 26 January 1999

"The statement being published on the internet was amongst documents and floppy disks taken from Child Advocacy International by Sharon Payne in August 1996 and copied. A second batch of documents were taken from North Staffs Hospital a few days later and similarly copied and returned. The documents were copied and widely circulated to mothers who had been campaigning for an investigation into Professor Southall. Some of the sets of copies went abroad. Southall and North Staffs Hospital took out confidentiality injunctions on everyone they believed had the documents or information from within them, even some people they merely suspected might have received them"

Details on Heather Collins

Name: Heather M Collins
Profession: Biomedical scientist
Registration number: BS 13670
Town in which she practised: Norwich
Date on which she entered the register: 3 March 1998 (this would have been as a registrant with the Council for Professions Supplementary to Medicine)
Date on which she left the register: 3 October 2007

As Penny Mellor herself admits, it seems that Heather Collins was Equaliser on msbp.com. Documentary evidence shows her IP address very very clearly. Heather Collins used to work in the NHS for a fairly long while. So, here we have a bunch of dysfunctional mothers with an NHS worker right in the middle of them. We ought to then ask ourselves what role she played in the photocopying party. She also had access to phenomenal amounts of NHS Data. Sharon Payne last year crowed in the Sunday Express about how great she was in theiving documents from David Southall. Sharon is of course nothing but a fat washed out woman who manipulates the truth regarding her own health issues. Yes, Sharon, even we have the evidence on that. It is just a matter of time before we feature it. An intricate story involving Penny Mellor right at the centre of it.

Penny Mellor and her Kingdom of Lies. The Stuart Carnie Myth

Stuart Carnie - Mellor's Fall Guy

The IP address of issued death threat was never traced by Staffordshire Police. It was never found to be Stuart Carnie.

On one hand Penny Mellor states that Stuart Carnie was in league with David Southall and on the other hand she states he issued a death threat against him. Mellor's internet knowledge is so poor that she was incapable of tracking the IP directly to Stuart Carnie at all. So why did she pick the name Stuart Carnie? Mr Carnie will no doubt fill us in on the truth one day. We are always happy to publish Stuart Carnie's version of events.

Mellor's dysfunctional brain really is fizzing today. Stuart Carnie was not the one who issued the death threat at all. Stuart Carnie was simply Mellor's fall guy because we all know who the death threat was issued by.

Again, Mellor places what we call " minority" documents that tell us nothing. This was amusing the three of us no end. She picks up a sheet of paper and starts a diatribe expecting the media to listen to her. Again we say that this is because of her addled brain that cannot analyse documentation or advanced information.

Mellor today then goes onto say "I did do something because we don't advocate any violence." That is why Mellor wrote repeatedly abusive material against David Southall on the internet so that death threats would be issued against him. Of course, Mellor will not be involved in violence herself but this does not mean she will not instigate and conspire about it. Mellor did indeed do something, she ensured the real culprit of the death threat against David Southall was concealed and the fall guy Stuart Carnie was framed. Distracting everyone from the real culprit[s] is her business. Stuart Carnie was her convenient fall guy. Stuart was also silenced from telling the truth.

Is that why Staffordshire Police allegedly affectionately labelled Penny Mellor a "Urban Terrorist"? There is no love lost between Staffordshire Police and Mellor. They dislike her.

We know all about the history of MAMA. How following the death threat, the msbp group flapped around getting rid of evidence and IP addresses. The good thing is this, we have a downloaded copy of the old msbp board and the new msbp board following the "clean up of evidence" that occurred. What is even more interesting is the Equaliser IP. The fact is that Penny Mellor attempted to frame Stuart Carnie for something he had never done. This is akin to how she has persistently attempted to frame Southall.

Our internal sources at the GMC know exactly what Penny Mellor has been up to. Far from being a clever little girl, Mellor is actually quite dim and predictable. Predictable in a manner because she makes mistakes when acting in desperation. Of course, Mellor is desperate. Desperate times call for desperate measures - well for Penny Mellor anyway. In the meantime, we have truck loads of evidence to write about where Mellor is concerned. Her wicked ways are particularly interesting.

Framing people is Mellor's business.

Mo Wilson's RED HAIR - THE SQUIRREL TAIL STYLE

Mo Wilson's Red Hair For the Press Ball
Modelled on a Red Squirrel's Tail.
Dye by Loreal.

By popular demand we bring you the subject of the Loreal hair dye yet again. Thankyou for all the emails sent to us about our post regarding Bugsy Malone and Talula at the Press Ball in Cardiff. This is the elite in journalism smiling away while they write the next sordid inaccurate story based on Brian Morgan's half baked ideas. It is a great shame that Brian Morgan has to lower the tone of the ball but not everyone is blessed with good looks. We assume they are of the view that only the press can write. Of course, lets have a reality check here and tell them all that we can write as well. Isn't that amazing? We are more interested in Mo Wilson's new fashion trend- a hair style based on a red squirrel tail. Clearly women everywhere are going for this new Squirrel tail style. We know that the Wolverhampton witch has certainly been spreading the rodent message around Wolverhampton.

Brian Morgan and Mo Wilson can be found dressed up for the ball. Did the clock strike 12 and did Mo Wilson's hair turn back to grey? This is our question.

Go to this link

Go to the first row

It is the second picture from the left.

Please tell us whether the red hair of Mo Wilson resembles that of a squirrel's tail. By way of example, we are providing a picture of a red squirrel [ see above]. The audience can match the hair style with the tail and give us their view. We are all for interaction. Since mention of the red hair dye, traffic has increased phenomenally. The picture can be purchased by all folk in Canvas Wrap for the cool price of £245. We love the excellent photographer Mike Thomas of Mike Thomas Photographers. We suggest that a photograph is sent to the General Medical Council for the attention of Finlay Scott. We also suggest that all women at the GMC sport this red hair based on a squirrel tail.

We may well decide to link to Mike Thomas permanently on the side bar. This is only because he is a fabulous photographer and yes, just remember - everyone should hire him. Weddings, GMC hearings, Hair Dye sessions etc.

Mike certainly has an eye for beautiful pictures. It is a great shame his hand slipped diagonally when taking the picture of Brian Morgan and Mo Wilson. We should suggest that the photograph may have come out better if it paperbags were used over the heads or perhaps the camera was turned upside down. These are only mere suggestions. Far be it for us to criticise this professional protographer. He is a brilliant photographer though and we should not hold this mild issue against him. We strongly recommend that everyone buy his pictures in large quantities. You too can have a canvas of Mo Wilson's Squirrel Tail Hairdo and Brian Morgan in a tux. You too can have it featured in your living room with the titles underneath it.

"Yes Shame, you will serve time in a prison RP, and learn how much lesbians come to love you - or not. You did not have a breast feeding baby removed - but you might get to experience breast feeling for the very first time.And this is nothing compared with what will happen to you. E-mail tampering - that's nothing - this is not the GMC you are up against - you chose your enemy".

By Our NTL Account.

We should compare Mo Wilson's photography to Mikes. Mo Wilson takes average pictures. Mike Thomas takes spectacular pictures. That is why Mike is successful and Mo is...... well, we don't know what Mo is really. We know she says nice things about herself. We just know that we don't rate her photos and we don't rate her style. We know that we could take pictures just like her with our mobile or a disposable camera. We could even email this post to the Arts Council and tell them about various aspects of Brian Morgan's past. This is the sort of thing Mellor and Morgan used to do to Child Advocacy International. Of course, the net effect was that people in the third world were denied care. But that doesn't matter to Morgan or Mellor or perhaps even Wilson. Only Mellor's msbp mothers suffer and the rest of the world doesn't of course. The fact that people in the third world died due to Mellor's activities means nothing to her. That is why Mellor feels the urge to write to places like the Lottery Fund and many others - so that funding can be denied to the third world and so that people can die in the third world.

Mike Thomas though should develop an art for wit. Perhaps as a dashing young man he may have been trapped behind the lens for too long. We can forgive him though as his photographs are much better than that of Mo Wilson. Mind you we have seen the quality of Brian Morgan's journalism and his ability to photograph. Did he place the camera lens on the right way? Perhaps Mike could teach him how to use a disposable camera properly.

Person Mike Thomas

Right click for SmartMenu shortcuts

MO WILSON's RED HAIR DYE

The problem with red hair dye is this, it acts to cover the grey hair. In Mellor and Mo Wilson's case, their choice of colour is important. It is very true that each of their styles resembles that of the red squirrel's tail but there we have it. Mo Wilson has an excuse of course, she is an NUJ Member. It would help if she could indeed use the camera properly but then we can't have everything in life. Cameras are interesting things, they ensure snapshots of a certain time in life. We often wonder whether they both used " Photography for Dummies" as an educational tool.

This is what Brian Morgan tells us on a BBC website

"I was one of the two arts workers, with Mo Wilson, the other, who helped these young people from the six schools, in just a couple of hours per school, learn how to use a camera (we practised with digital cameras). Then they took away instant cameras supplied by Rhondda Cynon Taff Borough Council and put into action what we had shown them, on carnival day. What an amazing set of pictures, and from such young people, who really listened to what we said to them and put this into action. I wanted a special mention for the best set of pictures, alongside the best individual ones. Showing a whole event is in important part of photography too. Thanks to all the children, the teachers at the schools who really joined in and helped the children try out ideas, and to the community and arts workers at RCT, in particular Rhian Iolo who co-ordinated this project"

We then quote the specific sentence "who helped these young people from the six schools". Our question is this, is a man who sends obscene messages through the internet able to work with vulnerable young children. Lets see what he wrote again.

"Yes Shame, you will serve time in a prison RP, and learn how much lesbians come to love you - or not. You did not have a breast feeding baby removed - but you might get to experience breast feeling for the very first time.And this is nothing compared with what will happen to you. E-mail tampering - that's nothing - this is not the GMC you are up against - you chose your enemy".

Of course, we were sent the entire unit of messages from Brian Morgan. Daniel was kind enough to send us the entire file of posts sent over. Lets break those sentences down.

"You might get to experience breast feeling for the very first time".

Now anyone hiring both Brian Morgan and Mo Wilson should pay particular attention to the mental state of these two who share a internet connection. Both have an NTL Account. Both are members of the National Union of Journalists and both probably find the above acceptable. We ask ourselves whether both Brian Morgan and Mo Wilson are prepared to read the above sentence out to each of the young people they work with. Are they prepared to say " this came from our internet account?" The point here of course is this, if Mo Wilson valued her reputation, she would dissociate from Brian Morgan because the problem with skeletons is that they often fall out. Brian Morgan often has many skeletons. It is simply that he feels those skeletons are a secret. Secrets don't remain secrets for much longer. Of course, our interest does not lie in Mo Wilson apart from her avid use of red hair dye. It does though lie with Brian Morgan, a man who prides himself in his investigative journalism, his NUJ membership and the fact he has spent years harassing doctors via the media and through the internet. Yes, we have even seen the consent order he agreed to. This is the problem with having a past and it is also the problem when crowing with laughter when doctors are being harassed .

Red Hair Dye is rather interesting. It covers up a multiple of sins. Oscar Wilde was a wise man and knew about human behaviour as we do. When we talk about Brian Morgan and Mo Wilson, we must observe that she is prepared to stand by her man through thick and thin. We particularly like this website . It is rather a baroque collection of articles.

Brian Morgan writes a conflict of interest. Here it is.

"Arrested, charged with conspiracy and cleared, just for being in contact with this family. My name provided to the police by Professor David Southall, along with the names of a number of parents of former patients of his, evidence for this disclosed during the above proceedings and available for inspection"

Essentially, our photojournalist's partner was

"Arrested, charged with conspiracy and cleared".

We wonder if any photographs were taken during this period. Perhaps a photograph of Brian Morgan being charged with conspiracy or perhaps cleared. Pictures are all about time and history is often interesting.

Back to Red Hair Dye, Penny Mellor uses it as well but that is simply because beauty was not granted to her at birth. Whether this is a genetic flaw or a flaw developed over time, we have no idea. Still, men are often desperate creatures, especially the type that would opt for Mellor when there is a world full of beautiful women out there. Penny Mellor is obsessed with Dr Pal. This amuses us somewhat given the nature of the authors on this blog. Penny Mellor makes a few admissions on her inept blog. This is what she says

"Just for the record, I went to DCI Bernard Pearce Staffordshire CID, told him who Equaliser was and Julie Patrick banned him immediately from the MAMA board. That person was Stuart Carnie, I still have the postings and the IP address which was traced back to him, (offically that is), I also have a record of that phone call. Being charged with a criminal offence has its advantages, one of those being that any contact I had with the police had to be recorded by said agency, now that would be the same Stuart Carnie that offered to help my co defendants at the same time as being in telephone contact with Southall, Oh and when you tell Carnie about this posting Rita, tell him I have his diary, the one the court never saw, the one with all the numbers and doctors names in it ...... Public Interest Immunity fades in time" .

Few issues here

1. Equaliser is an interesting kettle of fish.
2. Julie Patrick never knew that Stuart Carnie was Equaliser
3. That is because Stuart Carnie was never Equaliser.
4. The post was written by a woman
5. We are pleased that Mellor has the IP because we do too. In fact, we have tracked it down.
6. Staffordshire Police dislike Penny Mellor. They have always disliked her. Even their email systems are set up to quaranteen any mails citing her name, msbp or Brian Morgan.
7. An email recieved states the following "Someone else told me that she blackmailed Stuart Carney by pretending he burgled her house and she would tell everyone if he didn't comply"
8. Stuart Carnie was probably framed by Penny Mellor to deviate attention from her band of merry women.

Stuart Carnie is a man interested in a number of aspects in life.

We find it interesting that Mellor tells us that Stuart is to blame. That is even more interesting when we find that both Stuart Carnie and Penny Mellor once worked together.

The BMJ stated
BMJ 2002;324:693 ( 23 March )

The family's fears were groundless, the court heard, although doctors had diagnosed fabricated or induced illness, formerly known as Munchausen syndrome by proxy. At Mrs Mellor's behest, the child and her grandmother travelled to Mrs Mellor's home in Wolverhampton. Mrs Mellor put them in touch with a Scotsman, Stuart Carnie, with whom they subsequently went on the run for four weeks to Ireland and Scotland, the court heard.
The parents, grandmother, and Mr Carnie later admitted conspiracy to abduct a child. The family members were jailed for between six and nine months each last year. Mr Carnie failed to turn up for sentencing and is still being sought by police"

Again Mellor writes

"Stuart Carnie and the admissibility of his evidence. If Mr Carnie is not available for me to cross examine about certain aspects of his evidence, particularly telephone call contents how can I have a fair trial?"

Essentially Mellor is telling us that the death threat issued to Southall was apparently done by a man she was in contact with and the man she depended on for evidence. Carnie worked closely with Mellor but Mellor dissociates herself. If a person disliked Southall and was prone to conspiracy, would she issue the death threat on her own or get someone else to do it? That is the question. The audience can judge what Penny Mellor would do in this instance. Mellor certainly had the motive to issue the threat because she hates David Southall. She has an entire website set up to harass him. How far does this revenge go. Afterall, Mellor admits to knowing David Southall's home numbers.

It is interesting that the IP resolves to a company that Stuart had nothing whatsoever to do with.

Our question is this, is Stuart Carnie a man framed by Penny Mellor?. It is convenient to frame someone like Stuart as he has no defence at this present time.

A lady amusingly wrote "

Mellor is not helping her cause/s at all by behaving as an ill-mannered baboon"

and another wrote in and stated "

She was always supportive of the government. According to some she used to take details of the vulnerable sent to her and then call the SS to make malicious complaints they suffered MSBP!!!!!!!!"

Now, lets return back to Brian Morgan and Mo Wilson who work with young people. Does the above information seem appropriate for young people at all? There will be no doubt that such unsavoury characters will bother a respectable lady with red hair dye. One could of course turn a blind eye but life isn't often that simple. One cannot make assumptions that associations will remain a secret. After all, the Internet is a wonderful thing when analysed correctly. Everyone has a responsibility to young people. One can often tell many things about a woman who uses excessive hair dye and makeup. Reality for them isn't often easy to face. Brian Morgan and Penny Mellor no doubt hold the view that only they can write abusive material about doctors and no one will write to criticise them. Again, the reality is rather different because we believe that transparency is vital in this day and age. None of us can afford to use hair dye because what you see is what you get. Those who use hair dye have interesting character traits. Mellor certainly does. Mellor's modus operandi is to shift the blame of her actions onto others. Everyone knows Stuart Carnie was the fall guy. Everyone knows that the real engineer of many issues is Penny Mellor. We do often wonder whether things would have been different if the lady had a education. She admits to having a criminal mind and she is often of the view she is cleverer than many others. Of course, clever people never assume they are cleverest of them all.

It is All About Heather