CCHR [Brian Daniels] HELPING PENNY MELLOR GET "MSBP PSYCHS STRUCK OFF" - QUESTIONS MELLOR REFUSES TO ANSWER

For Penny Mellor, she has always crowed about the " TRUTH" and "Transparency".

So, lets have the disclosure and frank account of Mellor's contact with CCHR/ Scientology.

Questions for Mellor

1. How long have you been in contact with CCHR Scientology?
2.What is your contact with Breggin and Dr. Sami Timimi. Dr Sami Timimi was the event speaker at CCHR's award ceremony but Mellor will be aware of that?
3. How many psychs and paediatricians [ msbp] have you or CCHR referred to the GMC?
4. How many msbp psychs have been struck off?
5. How many mothers have you recruited to Scientology/CCHR.

Update 29th June 2008

It has been an interesting two days. Mellor has been unable to respond to the questions above.
Motormouth herself seems really lost for words. Mellor's bad language has been addressed by Totally Disgusted who was not impressed.

For two days, Mellor has been unable to be as transparent as she feels doctors should be. So, for the entertainment of the masses who regularly check back, we thought we would update you on a extract that we found this morning. This is Mellor singing Dr Timimi's praises. It might have helped if she could spell "psychiatrist".

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 3:18 pm
Post subject: Diagnosis of Autism

"I have met Sami Timimi who is a wonderful caring child psychiatirist, far more interested in what a child is really all about rather than attaching labels to them and making them "fit". His anti-drug stance is commendable and rare in this day and age. Glad to see somebody out there is more interested in helping children achieve their full potential rather than looking for a quick fix DX that renders some children almost catatonic in corners"

Below is an Extract of CCHR's Press Release posted on the msbp board by none other than Penny Mellor. We thought we would archive it in memory of the past actions of CCHR on the msbp board. The press release has Sami Timimi mentioned. He was also the psychiatrist who was speaker at the award ceremony where Penny Mellor was given her CCHR award.

What Sami ought to do is tell the Royal College of Psychiatrists that he is affiliated to an organisation that has commenced war on psychiatry. In addition, I hope he is telling his patients that he is affiliated to such an organisation. Actually, we all think the GMC should know about this. As the GMC visited here last week, we should ask that they take up a referral under the new personal beliefs guidance. Yes, we are of the view that Sami should be investigated by the GMC for his stance in relation to the press release below. The GMC may consider this a formal complaint against him. This is "information received" at the GMC and we expect them to conduct a thorough investigation while disclosing said investigation to his employers. Perhaps the GMC could leave a message here confirming reciept of this complaint.

PRESS RELEASE FROM CCHR as published by Mellor

OVER 1000 CHILDREN IN WEST MIDLANDS FALSELY LABELLED AND DRUGGED BY PSYCHIATRISTS
Added: (Tue Sep 13 2005)

The Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) Birmingham has released figures today collected under the Freedom of Information Act highlighting the psychiatric infiltration into the education system and subsequent damaging of young children?s minds in the West Midlands and Birmingham. Methylphenidate Hydrochloride, more commonly known as Ritalin or Conerta XL, is being falsely presented to parents as a ?treatment? for the spurious Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), despite much condemnation in the medical field as well as official health warnings from recognised institutions such as the United States Food and Drug Administration. Consultant child and adolescent psychiatrist, Dr Sami Timimi, who works full time in the NHS in Lincolnshire, is highly critical of the ADHD diagnosis. He says, "The idea that there is such a thing as a test for ADHD is nonsense. There is no such thing. "Despite the lack of evidence to support the theory that ADHD is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain, and that we as doctors know how to work out which children have that chemical imbalance, despite this just being a theory, it?s entered into popular mythology within the profession and accepted as a truth because it?s the theory that?s needed to justify the prescribing of stimulants." The Birmingham based group has found that over 1100 children in the West Midlands are being prescribed mind altering psychiatric drugs for an alleged condition the existence of which is based solely on opinion, unsupported by any proper scientific evidence. Chris Wrapson spokesperson for the group, stated: ?Psychiatrists are irresponsible. They prescribe mind altering psychotropic drugs in the same classification as cocaine to young children and then claim they have ?cured? an unruly child of his ?condition?. If you were to find a child who is perhaps a little boisterous towards his classmates or has ?ants in his pants?, or sometimes doesn?t pay attention in class, you would say he is merely being a normal healthy energetic child. To say that this constitutes amental illness, and that he has a chemical imbalance of the brain is dishonest. Psychiatry is a pseudoscience, dishing out labels for children based on no scientific evidence, mere opinion, and then giving them mind altering drugs. If a child were given a shot of cocaine, you would probably find them curled up in a ball in the corner, withdrawn, and very quiet, Ritalin is in the same class, and its effects can be devastating?. Local families and education services are affected by the ?expert? opinion of the psychiatrist, often to the detriment of the child himself. Parents of course have only their child?s best interests at heart and may not want to see their child drugged into submission (and worse). However if school denies their child his education unless they consent to this so called ?treatment? they can be pressured into giving their consent albeit unwillingly. The effects are devastating, a once happy adventurous and inquisitive child, can be subverted through the use of mind altering psychotropic drugs and can be found very often, collapsed asleep, fully clothed, sprawled across the landing, in doorways, out like a light. And what of the costs involved with this mass drugging? The average tax payer through his contributions, will be unwittingly financing the 5900 plus items prescribed by local Primary Care Trusts (costing somewhere in the region of £143,000 based on a positive response of only 23% of the trusts contacted who provided this information).

CCHR was established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and Professor of Psychiatry Emeritus and internationally acclaimed author, Dr Thomas Szasz, when the need for intensive reform of psychiatry became apparent. CCHR has exposed hundreds of unexplained or improper deaths in psychiatric institutions, the psychiatric rape of patients, child deaths from exposure to life threatening stimulants and many other human rights abuses.

Anyone with information on adverse reactions to psychiatric drugs (especially from children), or whose children have been diagnosed with ADHD and are concerned, can contact CCHR?s Abuse Line on 0121-523 8185. All confidence will be protected.
Chris Wrapson (Volunteer)

Media Relations Officer
Citizens Commission on Human Rights Birmingham
chris@cchr.org.uk or info@cchr.org.uk
07793 285 784 or 0121 523 8185

Warning - We advise that CCHR is not contacted by anyone vulnerable. While their views seem sympathetic, we have not had any revalidation of their motives.

Update 30th June 2008

Mellor continues to evade the questions asked of her. Today, she presents the CNEP case issues as a distraction for herself. Motormouth herself remains silent on these issues. Penny Mellor and Brian Daniels though appear separately in newspapers and press releases. They do though work together. We present Brian Daniels and our view of his comments.

It amuses us how a number of newspapers fail to tell the world that CCHR is actually the Church of Scientology. We are supposed to believe it supports human rights! We are surprised the press complaints commission allow such a dangerous organisation to sell themselves to the public. This is after the judges in the UK have given Scientology the reputation it deserves.

On the CCHR website Brian Daniels stated as follows

"Raj Persaud's dishonesty makes a mockery of the title doctor in favour of making a quick buck at other people's expense."Dishonesty within the psychiatric industry is coming to light more and more these days and we hope this will serve to warn the public to question and look for themselves not just at a clinical level but at an academic level too"

We must not forget that Brian Daniels is the man Penny Mellor [ the campaigner against David Southall] is linked to. And, on the 5th June 2005, she told a mother, "Here's the scientologists email address cchruk@btconnect.com you want to talk to Brian Daniels and he'll do whatever he can to help you".

So lets see who is judging who. The public should see what kind of organisation is being represented by Mr Brian Daniels. We don't need to say anything about Scientology, we simply have to let the judges tell us what they think of CCHR and Scientology. Pot calling kettle black springs to mind

Justice Anderson, Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia:

"Scientology is evil; its techniques are evil; its practice is a serious threat to the community, medically, morally, and socially; and its adherents are sadly deluded and often mentally ill... (Scientology is) the world's largest organization of unqualified persons engaged in the practice of dangerous techniques which masquerade as mental therapy."

Kenneth Robinson, British Minister of Health:

"The government is satisfied that Scientology is socially harmful. It alienates members of families from each other and attributes squalid and disgraceful motives to all who oppose it; its authoritarian principles and practice are a potential menace to the personality and well being of those so deluded as to become followers; above all, its methods can be a serious danger to the health of those who submit to them... There is no power under existing law to prohibit the practice of Scientology; but the government has concluded that it is so objectionable that it would be right to take all steps within its power to curb its growth."

Federal prosecutor's memorandum to the judge urging stiff jail sentences for 9 top leaders of Scientology who had pleaded guilty to criminal charges:

"The crime committed by these defendants is of a breath and scope previously unheard of. No building, office, desk, or file was safe from their snooping and prying. No individual or organization was free from their despicable conspiratorial minds. The tools of their trade were miniature transmitters, lock picks, secret codes, forged credentials and any other device they found necessary to carry out their conspiratorial schemes."

Justice Latey, ruling in the High Court of London:

"Scientology is both immoral and socially obnoxious...It is corrupt sinister and dangerous. It is corrupt because it is based on lies and deceit and has its real objective money and power for Mr. Hubbard... It is sinister because it indulges in infamous practices both to its adherents who do not toe the line unquestionably and to those who criticize it or oppose it. It is dangerous because it is out to capture people and to indoctrinate and brainwash them so they become the unquestioning captives and tools of the cult, withdrawn from ordinary thought, living, and relationships with others."

Judge Breckenridge, Los Angeles Superior Court:

"[The court record is] replete with evidence [that Scientology] is nothing in reality but a vast enterprise to extract the maximum amount of money from its adepts by pseudo scientific theories... and to exercise a kind of blackmail against persons who do not wish to continue with their sect.... The organization clearly is schizophrenic and paranoid, and this bizarre combination seems to be a reflection of its founder, L.Ron Hubbard."

Lord Denning:

"...capable of such danger that the public interest demands that people should know what is going on"

Judge Constandia Angelaki:

"It is an organization with medical, social and ethical practices that are dangerous and harmful," "It claims to act freely so as to draw members who subsequently undergo ... brainwashing by dictated ways of thinking that limit reaction capabilities."

2nd July 2008 Update.

As the audience can see, it has been nearly 5 days since the post RE Scientology has been placed up. No doubt following the visit from their royal highnesses at CCHR USA, Mellor decided to disconnect. Mellor has been talking about her usual rubbish. She though fails to answer the simple questions put to her above. The audience can come to their own conclusions regarding this. Her behaviour though is typical of a Scientologist - thumping away when they don't have a logical defence.

Comprehension Level Poor

Dianetics in Scientology - Please Repeat After Me :)

We all started to laugh today. Mellor stated "the below is just one of many cases to be appealed YEARS "out of time".

1. It is still an " Out of Time" appeal [ which we always stated could be done] on " new evidence".
2. Mellors own case was appealed but FAILED . Actually she was given no leave to appeal.
3. Mellor has no new grounds with which to mount an out of time appeal :) . We welcome her to try it out.
4. She still states that case law can be applied retrospectively :) . Mounting an out of time appeal on "new evidence" is DIFFERENT from considering case law created to change the case law of the past. So basically, the House Lords case recently cannot be used to overturn cases in the past by default!
5. Anyway, we await Mellor's win so we can feature it here. She can prove us all wrong and crow about it. Of course, she will lose. She has lost all her appeals so far :). That makes her a ex felon doesn't it?

Mellor is becoming a little confused and tied in her own arguments. I see she is thumping on her keyboard in a frenzied state - hitting all the right keys but not quite in the right order. We are all surprised that Dianetics has not taught her to thump the keys the right way or in the right order. Perhaps CCHR could send her on some more training sessions on " How the law is applied" or perhaps they could send her to one called " How to Mop Our Floors in a straight line without losing your temper" . Sadly, they keep sending her to the same sessions called
"Repeat after us"

Now lets get back to the important questions Penny Mellor

1. WHAT IS YOUR CONTACT WITH CCHR AND SCIENTOLOGY?
2. WHAT ARE YOUR QUALIFICATIONS?

I think we shall repeat these questions until Mellor answers them. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much. If she had been educated to basic standards then she would stop behaving like Andrew P King Neurotec Executive's fishwife. Note to her father - did anyone send Mellor to finishing school or deportment?

Close Friends - Beverley Hughes MP and Penny Mellor

Beverley Hughes, Minister of State for Children, Young People and Families. Here is old Bev on her website.

More on Bev is listed here.

Beverley does not make it known that she she is well known to Scientology Award Winner Penny Mellor.

In 2001, Mr Gummer stated in Hansard

" Mr. Gummer: The scientologists dignify a pyramid selling ramp with the word "religion", but when I say that, many scientologists will feel that I am stirring up hatred against them. Frankly, I am not trying to stir up hatred; I just do not want people to be led astray by that invention by Lafayette Ron Hubbard, who, as I understand it, made a lot of money out of it. If the Bill is passed in its present form, a lot of other people will call a lot of other ramps religion and protect themselves accordingly. I do not think that the Government know what they are doing. They are restricting people's right to point to sheer, outrageous, unbelievably wicked dishonesty".

Beverley responded as follows

" Beverley Hughes: I do not accept that. As the right hon. Gentleman knows, the provision contains operational safeguards, as do the provisions on incitement to racial hatred. The clause establishes a public order offence; it will require the Attorney-General's consent. I do not share the right hon. Gentleman's fears that cults such as scientology will be the subject of offences under the provision.

THE EMAIL FROM A SOURCE REGARDING MELLOR AND HUGHES

From: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Beverly Hughes
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 23:22:01 +1000
>
A short while ago Penny Mellor disclosed that Beverly Hughes M.P. and Minister for Children had arranged for her to be transferred to a prison near her home when she was serving her sentence and that Hughes was now her close friend and ally.

> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> I am prepared to be corrected but I do not believe Mellor is one of Hughes's
> constituents and this would appear to be a strange association and action by
> Hughes..

Mellor on Overturning Oscar Wilde's Verdict

"There is no sin except stupidity"

Oscar Wilde was a wise man. I believe it would amused him to think Penny Mellor was now thinking of reversing his verdict. To recap, Mellor told us that all modern case law had a retrospective application :).

She failed to understand the basics of " Precedent". It states "In common law legal systems, a precedent or authority is a legal case establishing a principle or rule that a court or other judicial body adopts when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts."

Oscar Wilde once stated "What we have to do, what at any rate it is our duty to do, is to revive the old art of Lying". Mellor does revive the old art of lying well.

Mellor will no doubt be aware that a personality disorder is not a mental illness. Her colleagues Sami and Breggin would have taught her the basics of that. Perhaps they have just taught her about being a parrot of CCHR as well. She is certainly feathery and rather repetitive. Today, she places David Southall's CV online yet again. She points out all the matters that Field Fisher Waterhouse checked out. Everything Mellor states regarding his CV are actually large fibs. We often wonder what the IQ of a CCHR parrot is.

We thought we would also present some of Mellor's crowings on her failed appeal. The audience should not that these emails are from 2005. It is now 2008 and Mellor still does not have a result. Now, what was that she said about retrospective application of case law? If CCHR has hired Mellor, we should ask ourselves which of the parties was the short sighted one. As Mellor will now know, surrounding herself with people with title and repute does not make her intelligent. Intelligence is not gained by osmosis.

1. From: DARETOCARE1@aol.com
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 06:41:25 -0400
Subject: Re: What I think
To:

As my case is going back to appeal, we'll see who conned who shall we.


2. From: DARETOCARE1@aol.com
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:24:55 -0400
Subject: Re: What I think
To:

wrong again, my criminal case is being appealed by my co-defendants as part of their case, nothing to do with me and that has ONLY just happened in the last two weeks. No conspiracy, however the entire email content will be made public in court to prove they targetted certain individuals with less evidence than they had on others.

For reference to Mellor's rantings.

"There is a time-limit of 28 days from the date of sentence (Meaning the date the Jury returned it’s verdict) within which any application by a Law Officer for leave to refer must be lodged with the Registrar of Criminal Appeals: Schedule 3(1) CJA 1988 (Archbold, 7-306)"

The 28 day time limit is absolute: there is no power at all to extend it or to apply for leave to refer out of time."

"Extension of time may be of two kinds: (a) extension of time in which to give notice of application for leave to appeal or notice of appeal or (b) extension of time in which to renew an application refused by the single judge. An application for extension of the 28 day period in which to give notice of application for leave to appeal or notice of appeal must always be supported by reasons why the application for leave was not submitted in time"

Royal Courts of Justice - Criminal Appeals Division - Document for Counsel/Solicitors :)

I believe that makes Mellor's appeal out of time. So who conned who then? Answers on a postcard please :). We shall monitor this though and see if Mellor wins her point. She won't though because she is the large parrot with the Scientology trained brain. We could call her an android parrot but alas that may just be insulting to androids.

EX CRIMINAL MOPS UP

Can Penny Mellor Use a Mop?

1. Today Mellor writes as follows "posting was met with a certain amount of amusement amongst my barrister friends"

2. On the 24th June 2008 she stated "After I had applied for full disclosre of his involvement in my arrest and subsequent charge, I already had the list of known associates provided by Southall, Guy Whitburn refused me the right to face my accuser" . Mellor feels she can go back to the case and get a number of pieces of information from the trial :)

3. We should note that Mellor's case failed.

4. We also know that Mellor's appeal failed.

5. We also know that there are no appeals at all now against the original sanction by the criminal courts. Any appeal would be out of time. The Davis case law does not apply to Mellor :)

6. Mellor cites that retrospective use of the case law in Davis is possible :). If this is so then all cases since the advent of the courts that have had anonymous witnesses could be appealed :). So all cases at the the Old Bailey Courthouse. London's Central Criminal Court from 1673 and onwards should now be appealed :) on the basis of case law made recently. This means that the Criminal Review Commission should be dealing with all cases since 1673. As usual Mellor cites 2 untested cases as her defence. They are though untested :). There isn't any doubt that those cases going in time for appeal would be able to use the R v Davis (Appellant) (On appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)). No one is disputing this. Mellor's own case though is over and done and completely out of time. In any event, David Southall was irrelevant in her conviction. Mellor can of course test out her bizarre theories, she won't win. Thats because she has never won a case on her own in her life. She needs some scientology input.

7. We have no idea which barristers are advising Mellor but they clearly have a very poor understanding of the law. Case law created now cannot be used to change case law in the past. If that were so, the courts would be oversubscribed and unable to cope. In addition, creating new case law every day would create the reopening of cases in previous years. That is illogical. Then Mellor is illogical. That is a fact. If what Mellor says was true, we could change the outcome of Oscar Wilde's trial by the use of libel case law today :).

8. As Mellor has bullshitted about her appeal repeatedly, talked about the Attorney General considering it etc etc, we will find that this statement of Mellor's today will come to nothing as well as she will never succeed in overturning Judge Whitburn's judgment. She can prove us wrong if she wishes.

As usual Mellor runs to her barrister friends and is unable at all to analyse issues for herself. She is of course unable to analyse her facts correctly. We dread to think what she has been doing with vulnerable mothers. If she wasn't a housewife and she went back to school to get her qualifications, she may have been able to think with her brain. As usual she wants to cheat. Mind you her legal advisers are just as airheadish as she is. Well, they must be to take a woman like her seriously.

Perhaps her legal advisers [ in this case Andrew " Beam Me Up" Scotty] could give us their view on the following

a. Does the Bar Council regulations permit associations with ex criminals? Not to mention use the lady as a conduit to leaking information about cases to the media and on the internet?
b. Is Andrew Scott qualified to diagnose a personality disorder :) ?
c. Did Mellor have any relationship with Hemming MP?
d. Is Andrew Scott a Scientologist ? Is Bill Bache a Scientologist?
e. What are Mellor's exact qualifications? Lets have the list
f. What is Mellor's exact relationship with the Church of Scientology? It is established that Mellor has been turned into a clone by them. The Church clearly failed to educate her in the basics of Science. Mind you, like Ron Hubbard, she spews out Science Fiction so they have something in common. Well, he must be such an inspiration when "psychs are struck off" with their help.

If Mellor knew her case law, she wouldn't have been serving time a prison near her family. Wasn't the transfer arranged by your old friend Bev in the Government?

Now where were we in considering the employment of a person with a criminal record. We had a post some time ago stating the following. The post stated as follows :-

"Now come on, even to clean floors these days you need basic exams. You have to get the dilution of cleaning fluid to water exactly right, or it is just one big sticky mess. Then of course you need a fairly good IQ to manage to fill in the stock request forms" LD

Perhaps suggesting a cleaning job with Molly Maids was aiming to her. What would LD suggest?

Airhead

Mellor tells us this today "Justice Guy Whitburn: " I am affording Professor David Southall Public Interest Immunity" After I hadThe case isn't mine" applied for full disclosre of his involvement in my arrest and subsequent charge, I already had the list of known associates provided by Southall, Guy Whitburn refused me the right to face my accuser"Not anymore honey, now I get to find out EXACTLY what went on". She quotes the latest House of Lords case, R v Davis (Appellant) (On appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)).

As for the case law on criminal trials, errrrm can someone tells the old bat that its not retrospective :)>

Of the Clark case, she states "The case isn't mine". Really, thats why we know the contacts between Mellor and the Clark case *wink*

She then states "'ll just hand it over to the police when I have my meeting with a certain Chief Constable eh". Would that be Mellors Scientology Police Officer friend? Didn't Mellor admit to knowing "bent officers" in the police force. Ah yes, we must dig that email out must we :).

Penny Mellor's Employment Prospects [ With a Criminal Record]

We all decided [ all 5 of us] that Mellor really needed a purpose in life. We decided that Andrew P King, Neurotec Tycoon was just not enough for Mellor's needs. As a bored and desperate housewife, we felt she would want to get into the employment sector. The above leaflet is available at http://www.jobcentreplus.gov.uk . It basically assists those with criminal records. Mellor as we know has a criminal record for conspiracy to abduct a child. We would also suggest night school to further her educational failings. She may wish to try http://www.learndirect.co.uk

Afterall, if she is headed hunted by the top dogs in Scientology, she really needs to live up to their reputation. You would think the bods at Scientology HQ would have had the intelligence to hire someone without a criminal record and with some basic education. Dear me! Perhaps if CCHR is an employer, they could employ her as floor cleaner or something. As for the audience, off you go to this website http://www.cchr.org.uk/.

CCHR has a video about how they get " msbp psychs struck off". We would publish it but you know how CCHR is addicted to copyright violation accusations. We only have to look at their complaint in Raj Persaud's case. But we must not forget the intrepid Dr Patrick Cosgrove who knew all about CCHR. Mellor would know all about that as she helped them do it. Apart from sweeping their floors and making cups of tea, she has been using her dyson to hoover up all the psychiatrists from the Royal College of Psychiatrists.

Seriously, we would all pick someone better looking, with better intellect and with a better eye for grammar and website design. Is she the current weakest link linked to CCHR? Well, only CCHR can tell us that. As we say, she could be more suited to tea girl or floor cleaner! At least she knows where all the dirt is.

A member of CCHR is as follows :). Nice art, shame about the choice of cult.

Fraser Kee Scott
Director
A Gallery
New works by rising stars in contemporary art
www.agallery.co.uk
www.myspace.com/frasersworld

Diamonds

Yes everyone understood the Scoring System apart from Penny Mellor. Perhaps if she concentrated more on books and less on diamonds, she may be able to understand them too. Again she places documents that mean nothing. Now where was that story that Totally Disgusted mentioned. Ah yes, here it is.

We quote Totally Disgusted

"I guess the question should be raised as to what will come sooner... David Southall in Prison over the evidence provided by Penny Mellor, or Penny Mellor charged with slander for all the times she attacks people and makes comments that are incorrect and untruthful?

I certainly know where I'd put my money"

To Totally Disgusted

Penny Mellor has no insight into the fact she is losing her pet case in the GMC Courts. We have just had information that in 2004 she harassed Prof Sibert who then decided it was too unsafe for him to give evidence in the Clark case [ GMC]. Witness intimidation eh. It is a great shame that the GMC did not take this up with the police.

Mellor is going to have to deny this and we are going to have to place all the documentation on this issue right up on the internet. Mellor tries to interfere with trials. She admitted to once knowing some of the jury. Sabotaging hearings is her speciality.

Judge Whitburn "It was very significant that that was the one aspect on which you admitted telling lies to the police"

This is not Penny Mellor's Backside.
Her backside is reputed to be has large as her mouth

Penny Mellor has now written two posts on her blog with the title "The Truth and Nothing But the Truth". It is a shame she admitted to lying to the police. Ah yes and for all those who do not believe us, we need to go back into the time machine and take a look at Mellor's judgment. Whitburn also termed Mellor a " dangerous eccentric". We have invited a few psychiatrists to join onto this blog. They will be posting in the next few weeks. Psychiatrists are of course people with views and are entitled to comment on the David Southall Exposed website. The psychiatrists from the US and India and a few from the UK are wild about this blog. Apparently, we provide them with hours of entertainment [ we aim to please!].

Their starting point is an analysis of criminal behaviour in the judgment below. Mellor always says she is innocent but we know she is simply a guilty fishwife who clearly misled the family and got them into a huge amount of trouble. There is nothing heroic about this case and Mellor failed her appeal [ although she has variations on a theme of what happened to this]. One of her crowing stories is about the case being considered by the Attorney General. This is simply her bullshitting again because she does that best. A neighbouring website referred to the story of the boy who cried wolf too many times.

So lets go back in time and review her judgment. Welcome down memory lane. Thankyou to the audience for returning to our parodies of Penny Mellor. Rumour even has it that Finlay Scott of the GMC may be dissociating from this group. That may be just a rumour or it may be true. Who knows.

IN THE CROWN COURT AT NEWCASTLE

Ref: T20010758

The Crown Court
Quayside
Newcastle Upon Tyne

21st March 2002

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE WHITBURN QC

REGINA v PENELOPE MELLOR

SENTENCE

APPEARANCES:

For the Prosecution: MR. C. KNOX
For the Defence: MR. T. PARKIN

JUDGE WHITBURN: Penelope Mellor, please stand.
Penelope Mellor, you were convicted by a jury of a wicked conspiracy to abduct [XXXX] in February 1999.

A woman of ability, determination and tenacity, you have been a self-appointed advocate for those, amongst others, whose children are taken into care on the basis of what was known as Munchausens Syndrome By Proxy, now known as Fictitious Illness Syndrome. Your view, expressed to the Jury, was that this was a misdiagnosis, designed to cover up medical negligence.

Impervious to debate, convinced you are right, you have traduced, complained about and harried dedicated professional people working in this difficult area. I do not punish you for that, let me make it clear, however tiresome and eccentric your views are, the toleration afforded to you who expressed them, by those who hear them, is part of the price we gladly pay for living in a liberal democracy.

What is unforgivable is the way in which you manipulated for your own, as I find, purposes, the genuine distress of the [XXXX] family. I am quite sure that before they visited you, mother, grandmother and child, on that fateful weekend towards the end of January 1999, that there was never any plan to abduct the child to Ireland, so as to keep the child away from Social Services in Sunderland.

Steps were taken, monies were drawn, tickets obtained, and this only after another long early morning call by you. It was you who put them in touch with [XXXX], and it was he who visited you before catching the ferry to Ireland and meeting up there with [XXXX] and [XXXX]. It was very significant that that was the one aspect on which you admitted telling lies to the police. He then of course took the grandmother and child to Scotland, and then orchestrated the non-negotiable demands, to effectively ransom the child.

The child was kept away, and despite being with her grandmother, she must have been, and as the Pre-Sentence Report clearly says, disorientated and confused. She was kept away for over a month. You said in evidence that you were thought by some to be the Svengali, the one who pulled the strings, but that you only empowered those caught up in such a case by giving them the tools to fight.

In this case I have no doubt, having seen you giving evidence and having the whole of the case, that you were the architect, the Svengali of the whole plan. [XXXX], her mother and her husband, would never have been part of any conspiracy to abduct had they not met you, you counselled and advised them, and as a result encouraging them throughout this conspiracy.

I am sure that on the evidence, only as a result, they embarked on that fateful course, which inevitably led to all three, of hitherto good character, serving sentences of imprisonment; mother and grandmother nine months, and father, who played a lesser role, six months, they readily followed where you had pointed.

As the Court of Appeal Criminal Division pointed out in dismissing the appeals of [XXXX] and [XXXX] and [XXXX], those who act as you and they did commit a serious offence, especially where what is done is to thwart the orders of the Court in respect of a child or proceedings taken in respect of a child, by removing the child from the jurisdiction of the Court and assisting the continuing absence of that child from the jurisdiction.

It is, and it is to be emphasised, the interests of the child which are paramount. It is chilling to read in the Pre-Sentence Report the effect of that abduction upon that already emotionally damaged child. You have made clear your cavalier disregard for the injunction of the High Court, viewing them as gagging orders preventing what you regard as the truth from emerging. Certain it is that you were pursuing your own agenda; the difficulties of the [XXXX] family, their emotional fragility, their suffocating love for their children fitted in well with the campaign that you were waging.

A woman of 40, hitherto good character, a mother of eight children, ranging from an adult to a small baby, any Court must pause and anxiously consider whether a custodial is inevitable. Sadly, I have done so, and it is.

I take into account all the personal matters of mitigation urged upon me. I have considered the Pre-Sentence Report, which so well sets out your background, and I am most grateful to Mr Parkin who has pleaded your case so eloquently.

What you are being punished for is orchestrating an abduction of a child, in part at least for your own propaganda purposes; an abduction which lasted over a month, and was only resolved at considerable cost of scarce Police resources and by good detective work. An abduction which cost others, who were unlikely to have participated without your encouragement, their liberty.

The very least sentence I can pass upon you, Penelope Mellor, is two years’ imprisonment. Of that you will serve half. Take her down. I make no order for costs.

Pineapple Upside Down Pudding - A Example of Penny Mellor's Way of Thinking

Penny Mellor - Presenting her Facts Upside Down

We continue the series on Penny Mellor's house wifery skills today. We hypothesise further that Mellor is rather good at Pineapple Upside Down Pudding. The reason is that her entire website contains various facts put in the wrong order and on each occasion - upside down. As Eric Morcambe would say " All the right notes but not necessarily in the right order". In dedication to her brain type, Penny Mellor we hope will take up this recipe of Pineapple Upside Down Pudding.

We refer to the BBC Cookery website for their Pineapple Upside Down Pudding. It should be renamed as the Mellor Upside Down Pudding. Perhaps we could add a few sprinklings of the fruitcake ingredients into it.

An interesting example of upside down logic and the fact that Mellor cannot keep her story straight is this.

On the 16th June 2008 she said the following on her blog "There has been criticism of my posting the "odd" document instead of entire protocols, well there is a very good reason for that and it is this, this blog was not set up to inform the public, this blog was set up specifically to let Southall know that I know, he and his cohorts will know from the "odd" document exactly what I now have by way of evidence and I know David reads my blog!"

On the 22nd June 2008 she states as follows "For the benefit of my readers, this was obtained through legal channels"

According to her, the blog was only written for David Southall. There should therefore only be one reader. As David Southall is currently at a hearing and not reading her blog, that leaves no readers [ by her own admission].

It is of course good that she admits to Bill Bache or related lawyers leaking out information to her. That is contrary to Law Society Guidance.

Upside Down Pineapple Pudding :). A dedication to Mellor's way of thinking - if we can call it that.

Ingredients
55g/2oz caster sugar
55g/2oz unsalted butter
55g/2oz self-raising flour
2 eggs
handful of cashew nuts
55g/2oz caster sugar
55g/2oz pineapple rings, cut into chunks
drizzle of vanilla essence
drizzle of cream, to serve

Method
1. Preheat the oven to 220C/425F/Gas 7.
2. Cream the sugar and butter together in a food processor until pale and fluffy. Add the flour, eggs and cashew nuts and blend again to combine.
3. Heat the sugar in an oven-proof pan until a caramel has formed. Add the pineapple chunks and vanilla essence and shake the pan to coat.
4. Spoon the sponge mixture on top of the caramelised pineapple and then transfer to the oven and bake for 15-20 minutes, or until golden brown and springy to the touch.
5. Turn the pudding out onto a serving plate and drizzle with cream to serve.

Show me more pineapple recipes
Show me more Paul Rankin recipes

Grandiosity and Attention Seeking Behaviour

Penny Mellor tells the world at large today :-

"So let's remind everyone when people began to take notice shall we"

We should remind the audience. This is what Mellor once said in an email Tue, 4 Oct 2005 12:17:54 -0400

"In the not too distant future the entire country will see what I have been working on and perhaps then you'll all realise the the universe doesn't revolve around xxxxxxxxxxx"

At the time, we asked does this fit with the following?

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following^[1]:

1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes that he or she is "special" and unique
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement
6. is interpersonally exploitative
7. lacks empathy
8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitude

17 psychiatrists and related doctors voted in at yes. 2 voted in at " do not know" and 1 left a message that was rather offensive to Mellor.

She then writes as follows

"I won't shut up until David goes to prison, just as I state at the start of this blog"

We say, it could be a long long wait. I mean we can imagine her waiting at her keyboard in the year 2040 - old and withered while David Southall is sunning himself in the South of France. The only person that has seen the four walls of a prison is Penny Mellor. Penny has a criminal record. David has no criminal record. That is interesting isn't it?

Penny Mellor's addiction to David Southall

Just to say that we have spotted Mellor back to her running commentary on David Southall. It seems she has to do so at least once a day only deviating to speak to Rita Pal.

We see that she has brought up her children well. One of them seems to be making an obscene sign to the world. Clearly money cannot buy good behaviour in her children. One cannot expect anything else more from a fishwife who clearly spends even her Sundays dreaming about David Southall. She may well like to spend that time teaching her children some manners.

It is only a shame Mellor cannot interprete and understand the documents in her possession. It provides high level entertainment for us to observe what she comes up with next. She is clearly making more combinations of her Mellor original fruitcake recipe. The pathological obsession with David Southall seems to be ongoing now. Perhaps this is what we call Fatal Attraction, who knows.

Our psychiatrists inform us that the analysis here is this - by saying David Southall is guilty all the time, Mellor has a reason to concentrate on his documents . She does not seem to be able to let go. If she cannot have him, all that remains is the documents. This is the kind of phenomena seen in victims who cannot let go of their fixed ideas. Because they do not have a life themselves, they tend to gather their documents and repeatedly go through them again and again. It gives those without a purpose in life - some kind of purpose. Mellor's life revolves around David Southall, some would call it an unhealthy obsession. The matters she raises have been rehearsed in forum after forum, within various complaints system and they have been thrown out. Mellor though continues to re-rehearse them continually in different forums. She has done so for about 10 years now.

In conclusion, Penny Mellor is unable to let go of David Southall, continues to talk to him on the internet as a running commentary.

"On a completely different subject, our discussion on some interesting personality disorders was discussed in detail. Here is another interesting section that may be familiar to some people.

"Narcissistic rages are based on fear and will endure even after the threat is gone.^[3] To the narcissist, the rage is directed towards the person that they feel has slighted them; to other people, the rage is incoherent and unjust. This rage impairs their cognition, therefore impairing their judgment. During the rage they are prone to shouting, fact distortion and making groundless accusations. It’s believed that narcissists have two layers of rage. The first layer of rage can be thought of as a constant anger (towards someone else), and the second layer being a self-aimed wrath. Two specific identified forms of narcissistic rage are explosive and passive-aggressive. The explosive form being an obvious anger, for example, damaging property (or people) and being verbally abusive. The passive-aggressive sort might be sulking or giving their target the silent treatment. They can become enraged to the point of being homicidal especially if he/she has the need to seek revenge.^[4]"

Scientology Money

Some people work for their money and take the effort to be educated. Other simply harvest it through a cult religion. Rich girl, rich car, rich man but lacking in education and intellect. Well, in legendary Wolverhampton housewives only have to campaign to be paid handsomely. Thats if they have a long hobbie of fishing for doctors and any professional that disagrees with her. Perhaps she should stick to baking fruitcakes. At least she may be able to get names of the ingredients right from Walmart. That should be the start of rehabilitation in her aim at being a good housewife. That must be her aim as a basic education isn't.

Totally Disgusted wrote to us recently. This is what she said

"I'm feeling a little put out over here.... Firstly I'm accused of being Rita Pal and now I'm someone else. Will Mellor ever get her facts right and do a little research before publishing her slanderous remarks? Surely she must realise that the more she is consistently incorrect, the less credible she becomes. Of course, I was being a little generous there in assuming that she had some credibility to begin with :-)"

TD - yes, you were rather generous. Remember she has the education of a 10 year old and the rest is what we term " bullshitting" well.

Message to EC - All points noted. Please accept our apology. Best Wishes to you.

BAKING FRUITCAKES

All housewives should learn how to bake. That is my view as a man. I love cakes. In my view, a woman who is a all rounder bakes well. We wondered whether Penny Mellor could actually cook. In our view, given the current incoherent diatribe on her website, we postulate the hypothesis that she is indeed a bad cook. We say this because she places all her ingredients together but not quite in the right order. As someone once said, she isn't the sharpest tool in the box. Penny Mellor should though start with a fruitcake recipe - to improve her cookery skills of course. It is rumoured that her last man Mr Devlin choked all the way to work one afternoon due to the severe lack of cooking skills. Perhaps these days, the Scientologists pay for a maid for her. Scientologists would be a dab hand at baking fruitcakes. Apparently, they do it all the time. The sentence contruction today is even more dire than it was in the past. Perhaps she could try this fruitcake if she hasn't already. That is of course if she hasn't got a bun in the oven first.

As Penny continues to to have a running commentary with her two favourite people - David Southall and Rita Pal, perhaps she could ask both of them to come bake cakes with her. They may be able to show her how to put the ingredients in the bowl the right way round. A psychiatrist once said "These productions are not altogether destitute of merit; but the enormous number suggest the idea that the world must have been for ages nothing more than a bloody battlefield on which she was the chief destroyer". Perhaps baking will enable Mellor to feel a little better about her obsessional ideas on David Southall and Rita Pal.

From Whats Cooking in America.

"Fruitcakes should be made well in advance of the time that they will be used. One month of storage is a necessity. Two, three, or even four months is not too long a time if the storage facilities are cool and dry.

Fruitcakes freeze very well. However, they must be aged at least four weeks before freezing, as they do not mellow while they are frozen.

Take several days to make your cake or cakes. prepare the nuts and fruits, pour the liquor to be used over them, and let the mixture stand well covered for two or three days. Then make the batter and bake your cakes. The cakes will be better and the pressure in a busy household will be eased.

Always bake fruitcakes at a low temperature, no higher than 325 degrees and preferably much lower. Line the pans with brown paper or waxed paper to prevent the cakes from burning during the long baking time. Always place a pan of hot water on the floor of the oven. This prevents the cakes from drying out. Test for doneness with a cake tester inserted in the center of the cake. It will come out moist, but not doughy, when the cake is done.

Cool fruitcakes on a rack in the pans in which they were baked. When cakes are cooled, turn them out of the pans and carefully peel off the paper. If you are not decorating the cakes before storing them, wrap them in cheesecloth. Sprinkle liberally with whatever liquor or wine was used in the recipe. Seal the cakes in plastic wrap or in plastic storage bags. Once a week, brush the cakes with more liquor.

Perhaps the most important, don't feel absolutely bound by a recipe. If the recipe calls for brandy and you don't have it (or like it), use wine or even a fruit juice of your choice. If the recipe calls for citron and you don't care for citron, substitute another candied or dried fruit. If you don't like raisins, use more chopped dates and fewer raisins. If the recipe calls for particular amounts of candied pineapple and cherries, the same weight of a fruit mix may be used. The important thing to keep in mind is that the weight of fruit and nuts should be approximately the same as in the original recipe. Within this boundary, you can make substitutions of your own choice"

RIGHT ANGLES TO REALITY

There is a serious problem with Penny Mellor. We were left a message through this blog today. The message contained a post by Totally Disgusted.

She had written the following on her blog aptly labelled Where Is Dr Pal?

"So Penny, each time you claim that this blog is written and owned by Rita, you are only making a fool of yourself to the people who know who I am. It proves that your level of research is unsubstantiated allegations and calls into question the authenticity of any research you do. Please learn to get your facts right before making anymore comments about my blog".

Yes you tell her Totally Disgusted. You tell her that she fails to see whats right in front of her.
Imagine what she does with CNEP. You say " No it isn't" , she says " Oh yes it is" and we could just have a pantomine right on here couldn't we. TD - whether you are a guy or gal, just remember that old Penny's brain has been messed up by all sorts of substances. Nicotine is one such substance.

By the way, where is Dr Pal these days? This is where she is http://www.nhsexposedblog.blogspot.com .Imagine that. Oh, and she writes her name on the side identifying herself as one of the bloggers. That should give you a huge clue.

So lets recap for Penny Mellor for the millionth time.

1. Where Is Dr Pal is written by Totally Disgusted. Totally Disgusted has nothing to do with us.
2. http://www.nhsexposedblog.blogspot.com is written by Dr Rita Pal and Simon Ford.
3. http://www.wickedconpirator.blogspot.com is written by Steve Singhal and Friends.
4. http://www.realitylapse.blogspot.com was written by Paul Heathcote. How do we know that? Well we are techs as well and we know Paul Heathcote placed what he thought to be Dr Pal's home address online. Paul Heathcote may be of the view that he was anoymous but he wasn't. Scientology addled your brain Paul eh? Its all gone a bit skewy, hasn't it mate. Hanging around Mellor and Morgan will do that to you. Aligning himself to those with personality issues rubs off really. Shall we get one of our psychiatrist friends to hop over to Totally Disgusted's website and consider why you are claiming incapacity benefit while doing work on the side. Pubs are great things especially in Sheffield.

Thankyou to our psychiatrist friends in Oz, India, US and the UK for their input on this blog.

NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS WASTE MONEY ON BRIAN MORGAN's PET HOBBY

Diagnose and Be Damned shows the following

"The National Union of Journalists paid costs of £25 000 when it funded Morgan in his failed attempt to have Payne's purloined documents made public. Morgan states there is no formal organisation, merely a "loose network of contacts" and "a grapevine."

Justice for Families states as follows

Brian Morgan -

This struggle cost Brian Morgan's union, the NUJ, £50,000.

A few days ago, the National Union of Journalists featured on NHS Behind the Headlines. Apparently they are not "standing by Brian Morgan" any longer.

The blog also startlingly cites Morgan as a cyberstalker and harasser. The mails sent to the blog owner can only be written by someone with serious personality issues. Given this statement, is Brian Morgan safe to be a supporter of Justice For Families. The group seems to consist of a serial philanderer and a stalker. No doubt Penny Mellor will provide support from first hand evidence of being in prison.

Perhaps next time Brian Morgan could ask the Scientologists to fund his pet hobby. It might be worth while rather than abusing the funds of hard working journalists. Then Morgan has to rely on other hard working journalists as he isn't one.

Brian Morgan's Policed Past

Child abuse inquiry journalist
is now under arrest

By Paul Taylor: Chief reporter
Sunderland Echo

Police have arrested an investigative journalist who was involved in exposing a child abuse controversy surrounding a Sunderland family.

Brian Morgan 59, a freelance and photo-journalist since 1985, who also produces TV
documentaries and reports, was arrested at his office in Cardiff on Thursday morning, by two detectives who had travelled there from Sunderland. Along with a third officer from South Wales, they told Mr Morgan he was under suspicion of conspiring with the Sunderland family to keep a child out of official custody and seized his computer and various documents.

Mr Morgan denied committing any offence before being taken to Cardiff’s Fairwater police station and interviewed. He was released on bail, to report to a Sunderland police station later this month.

A Northumbria Police spokeswoman said: “A Cardiff man was arrested by police in connection with conspiracy to abduct a child. He is currently on police bail, pending further inquires.” But the police declined to comment on statement by Mr Morgan’s solicitor, Clayton Williams, who said: “It is a very serious issue for journalism, and freedom of speech and expression if, as Brian advises me, he is involved purely because of his interest as a journalise.” He added that if police could not produce irrefutable proof that Mr Morgan had done anything other than a legitimate job of investigative journalism, their actions raised serious issues about freedom of speech.

Mr Morgan assisted the Echo in reporting the controversy behind the story of a local family who had a child taken into care after two paediatricians voiced a suspicion that the child’s illnesses may have been induced by adult relations.

Mr Morgan has devoted his working life throughout the 1990s to investigating and reporting on a disputed diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy, which initially was suspected in the Sunderland case, although it did not form the basis of care decision.